Many founders honestly commit to staying after an acquisition but underestimate the psychological shift from owner to employee. The loss of ultimate control often leads to their departure, despite their best intentions and contractual obligations. Diligence must assess this psychological readiness.
Related Insights
In a non-control deal, an investor cannot fire management. Therefore, the primary diligence focus must shift from the business itself to the founder's character and the potential for a strong partnership, as this relationship is the ultimate determinant of success.
Palo Alto Networks' M&A playbook mandates that acquired founders, who out-innovated internal teams, take charge. This empowers the founders and leverages their proven expertise, even if it unnerves existing employees. The people who were winning in the market should be put in charge.
Due diligence cannot quantify a team's crucial soft skills. When an acquirer forces change aggressively post-close, they risk an exodus of these skills and key talent, maximizing the chance of the investment failing. A partnership approach that preserves talent for at least the first year is a much safer strategy.
When a founder faces a major acquisition offer, the pivotal question isn't just about valuation, but temperament. A board member should ask, "Are you built to be a public company CEO?" The intense stress and public scrutiny aren't for everyone. Pushing a founder who isn't an "IPO guy" to reject an offer can be a disastrous long-term decision.
Understanding a founder's real motivation for selling is crucial. Some want a partner for growth, while others are seeking an exit. A founder could take a partial earn-out and leave the day after closing, abandoning the business and becoming your biggest integration risk.
Daniel Lubetzky warns that entrepreneurs often mistakenly believe they can avoid culture clash after being acquired. The tension between a fast, transparent startup and a cautious, secretive corporation is a fundamental friction that founders should expect rather than hope to overcome.
The success of acquiring a founder-led asset manager depends less on its track record and more on the founder's willingness to transition from a self-focused P&L mentality to an employee mindset within a larger entity. This psychological shift is the primary determinant of a successful integration.
Beyond financials or deal terms, the single most cited frustration for founders post-acquisition is the loss of control over the company culture they built. This emotional attachment often outweighs other challenges, highlighting what founders truly value.
Founders remain long after hired executives depart, inheriting the outcomes of past choices. This long-term ownership is a powerful justification for founders to stay deeply involved in key decisions, trusting their unique context over an expert's resume.
A key to M&A success is creating a founder-friendly environment. Avoid killing entrepreneurial spirit by forcing founders into a rigid matrix organization. Instead, maintain the structures that made them successful and accelerate them by providing resources from the parent company.
