We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Baier explains that interviewing Donald Trump requires interjecting during pauses ("on the breath") and constantly redirecting him back to the topic ("work the weave") when he goes on tangents. This is a specific, practical technique for managing dominant and evasive interview subjects.
The host argues that the goal of interviewing powerful figures is to get them to answer tough questions, not to create a viral "gotcha" moment. By maintaining a conversational and respectful tone, even while asking pointed questions, journalists can disarm defensive subjects and get more revealing answers.
World leaders appear on Bret Baier's show because they know Donald Trump watches it religiously. This effectively transforms the news program into a de facto communication channel, allowing foreign leaders to pipe their messages directly to a key US political figure, bypassing traditional diplomatic routes.
The best interviews aren't about one person dominating. They're like a long tennis rally where both participants hit the ball hard but aim to keep the conversation going, creating a more engaging and insightful exchange for the audience.
Sorkin prepares for interviews by mapping a "flight path"—knowing the start, end, and key topics. However, he expects "weather" (unexpected answers) to force diversions. This mental model provides structure while allowing the flexibility to listen and react, which is the key to a great interview.
Citing Oprah Winfrey, Rubenstein argues the key to great interviewing is not having the best questions but being a great listener. True listening allows the interviewer to pivot and follow up on unexpected answers, turning a rigid Q&A into a genuine conversation that uncovers far deeper insights than a prepared script ever could.
Bret Baier defends his off-the-record interactions with Donald Trump, such as golfing, not for immediate scoops but for understanding his mindset on key issues. This reframes the "access journalism" debate, suggesting the primary value lies in gaining strategic context rather than trading integrity for a single story.
An interviewer's goal is to learn, not to talk. By dominating the conversation, as when the interviewer's question was twice as long as the answer, nothing is learned. A good rule of thumb is to limit your own speaking time to 10-15% to maximize information gathering.
To broach a sensitive topic, Andrew Ross Sorkin reads a critical quote from another source. This technique shifts the focus from a personal attack ("I think you...") to a public concern ("Others are saying..."). It forces the interviewee to grapple with an issue they have likely already considered, leading to a more thoughtful response.
A host or interviewer can never blame a difficult guest for a bad interview. They must take full responsibility for the outcome, even if it means they "picked the wrong elephant." The burden of creating an engaging conversation always falls on the host.
Instead of personally challenging a guest, read a critical quote about them from another source. This reframes you as a neutral moderator giving them a chance to respond, rather than an attacker. The guest has likely already prepared an answer for known criticisms.