The shift from transactional to solution selling is difficult because channel economics are traditionally built on volume. Partners are hesitant to invest the extra time required for consultative selling when the immediate financial incentive isn't there. Vendors must bridge this gap with co-selling, co-creation, and enablement to prove the ROI of a value-based approach.

Related Insights

StackAI's early attempts at using resellers were counterproductive because the product and messaging were evolving too quickly. Partners can't sell a moving target. The channel only became successful after the company established a clear ICP and repeatable value proposition.

Shift partner tiering away from being solely based on sales volume. Instead, use a partner's investment in training and certification as the main parameter. This approach rewards commitment and capability, which are leading indicators of future success. It allows smaller, highly-invested partners to be recognized and supported appropriately.

A common vendor mistake is attempting to apply a direct sales model to the channel. uSecure found success by truly adapting its business model, citing specific examples like moving from annualized to flexible monthly billing and eliminating minimum purchases. These concessions signal a genuine, partner-first commitment rather than just paying lip service.

uSecure initially underestimated how resource-constrained MSPs are. Their breakthrough came when they moved beyond simple PDF guides and built a white-labeled sales prospecting tool. This tool helped partners automatically build a data-driven business case for their own clients, proving uSecure understood their challenges and driving scale.

The B2B sales channel has evolved from a linear reseller model to a complex ecosystem. Deals are now shaped by multiple, often unknown, partners like consultants and system integrators. Vendors must act like detectives to map this hidden influence network to succeed.

Traditional revenue tiers (Gold, Silver, Bronze) are vendor-centric. A more effective approach is to classify partners by their business model. For example, an MSSP needs predictable upfront costs to build a service, while a value-added reseller may prefer volume-based rebates. Tailoring your program to their model, not just their size, is key.

As ad costs rise and organic reach declines, B2B businesses should evolve their sales teams. Instead of focusing solely on cold outreach, empower them with the bandwidth and capability to build and manage a systemized network of referral partners. This creates a predictable and more profitable growth engine.

Vendors and TSDs get lost in partner labels. The critical distinction is the partner's business model: Do they want a residual commission, to resell on their own paper, or a one-time payment? Offering this flexibility is key to recruiting and enabling modern partners.

In a B2B supplier or distributor model, success depends on going downstream. You must understand not only your direct partner's business drivers and KPIs but also the needs of their end-customer. This allows you to align strategy across the entire value chain.

Instead of letting a partner program evolve organically, start with a clear vision of the ideal channel based on board-level metrics. Actively build towards that future state, which includes strategically stopping activities that only service a legacy model.