Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The "fundamental attribution error" bias causes us to assume negative intent. When someone cuts us off in traffic, we judge their action ("they're a jerk"). When we do it, we justify our intention ("I'm rushing"). Recognizing this psychological tendency in ourselves is the first step to overcoming it at work.

Related Insights

We tend to generously assess our own listening skills because we know our intent was to listen well. However, we judge others' listening based solely on their observable behavior. This cognitive gap leads most people to believe they are good listeners while their colleagues are not.

Whenever you harshly judge someone, it's a sign that you're avoiding an emotion within yourself, such as jealousy, shame, or fear. To uncover it, ask: "If I couldn't feel this judgment, what would I have to feel?" The answer reveals a part of yourself that you are not accepting, and resolving it dissolves the judgment.

The call for radical workplace honesty ignores the psychological reality that most people view themselves through a self-serving, biased lens. Their "honesty" is often a projection of an inflated self-concept, as true self-awareness is rare and rarely aligned with how others perceive them.

We judge ourselves based on our chaotic, unfiltered internal monologue while judging others by their curated external presentation. This massive data imbalance fosters the false belief that we are uniquely strange or broken, damaging our self-esteem.

We create a double standard by attributing our weaknesses to our upbringing while claiming our strengths as our own achievements. This overlooks the reality that both positive and negative traits are often forged in the same crucible of our childhood experiences.

It's common to blame parents for negative traits like anxiety. However, this is an attribution error unless you also credit them for the positive side of those same traits, such as attention to detail. One must either own both wins and losses as self-authored or attribute both outcomes to their upbringing.

The main reason to assume positive intent isn't just to improve collaboration, but to reduce your own misery and suffering. Giving others the benefit of the doubt is reframed as giving yourself "the benefit of low blood pressure," making it a powerful personal well-being tool before it's a team-building one.

A common cognitive bias leads us to attribute our shortcomings (e.g., anxiety, perfectionism) to our upbringing, while claiming our strengths (e.g., ambition, discipline) as our own achievements. This skewed accounting externalizes blame for the bad while internalizing credit for the good, ignoring that both may stem from the same parental pressures.

A key reason biases persist is the 'bias blind spot': the tendency to recognize cognitive errors in others while failing to see them in ourselves. This overconfidence prevents individuals from adopting helpful decision-making tools or choice architecture, as they instinctively believe 'that's them, not me.'

Humans are hardwired to escalate disagreements because of a cognitive bias called the 'fundamental attribution error.' We tend to blame others' actions on their personality traits (e.g., 'they're a cheat') far more readily than we consider situational explanations (e.g., 'they misunderstood the rules'). This assumption of negative intent fuels conflict.