Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

To manage increased risk in struggling companies, lenders are moving beyond simple repricing. They are creating novel hybrid capital instruments, like 'debt like PREF' or securities tied to EBITDA growth, which preserve debt protections while capturing equity-like upside for the lender.

Related Insights

The prevalence of specific, quantifiable deal terms offers a unique window into the market's mood. Rising structural protections for lenders or increased flexibility for borrowers act as an early warning system, reflecting anxieties and optimism before they appear in traditional economic data.

A massive quarterly jump in "lien subordination" protections (to 84% of deals) signals a strategic shift among lenders. Instead of focusing on terms that prevent default, they are obsessed with securing their place in the payment line during bankruptcy, suggesting they view distress as increasingly likely.

In uncertain markets, a hybrid private equity model offering both debt and equity is a key fundraising differentiator. This structure appeals to LPs by providing current income and J-curve mitigation, while also expanding the firm's deal sourcing pipeline to companies needing capital but not ready for a sale.

While receiving high cash interest feels good for a lender, it can doom the investment. Forcing a distressed company to allocate all its cash to debt service starves it of the resources needed for a turnaround. This makes PIK (Payment-in-Kind) structures a more sustainable, albeit less immediately gratifying, option.

High-yield returns on investment-grade private credit are not paid by the borrowing company on the entire loan. Lenders generate these returns by selling the low-risk senior debt and retaining a small, highly-levered 'first loss residual' tranche, which offers mid-teens returns for a credit-like risk profile.

Instead of competing, the private credit market often serves as a safety valve for companies struggling in the syndicated loan market. These borrowers can refinance into private credit, accepting higher interest rates in exchange for a more accommodating lender group and crucial time to turn their business around.

For underperforming companies, a gap often exists between the market-clearing leverage for senior debt (e.g., 5x EBITDA) and their current debt load. Specialized investors provide junior capital to fill this "two-turn problem" or "air bubble," facilitating a refinancing that senior lenders alone won't support.

Lenders are demanding more structural protections (like "anti-pet smart terms") to lock down collateral, while borrowers are negotiating for more economic flexibility (like generous EBITDA add-backs) to weather potential storms. This "flight to fortification" on both sides signals deep-seated market uncertainty.

Jeff Aronson reframes "distressed-for-control" as a private equity strategy, not a credit one. While a traditional LBO uses leverage to acquire a company, a distressed-for-control transaction achieves the same end—ownership—by deleveraging the company through a debt-to-equity conversion. The mechanism differs, but the outcome is identical.

Unlike syndicated loans where repricing can be threatened easily by banks, direct loans have structural protections. Borrowers must find an entirely new lender and pay new fees to refinance, making it much harder to reprice debt downwards and thus preserving higher returns for investors.