Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Many corporate marketers know channels like TV are ineffective for reaching Gen Z but continue spending there. Their bonuses and job security are linked to internal scoring systems that favor traditional media, forcing them to make suboptimal decisions to protect their income and avoid getting fired.

Related Insights

CFOs and CEOs are noticing a major discrepancy: marketing ROI reports look positive while actual business results are soft. This is because legacy metrics from agencies justify spend on outdated channels, obscuring the lack of tangible impact.

Leaders often choose expensive, traditional advertising for ego gratification, like a TV spot during a baseball game, over more effective and profitable digital platforms. This preference for the familiar methods of 'yesterday' stifles growth and wastes money in favor of personal validation.

Brands over-invest in TV, mistaking ad placement for consumer attention. Viewers are distracted during commercials. Social media ads, integrated into feeds, capture actual attention more effectively and provide better ROI, even for older demographics who are heavily on platforms like Facebook.

Large companies cling to outdated models, measuring the "potential" reach of ads on billboards or TV. They fail to see that social media delivers "actualized" reach by capturing guaranteed user attention, which is far more effective and measurable.

Many large agencies are not truly consumer-centric. Their business model incentivizes focusing on winning industry awards (like Cannes Lions), pleasing internal stakeholders, and navigating corporate politics. This creates a fundamental disconnect from where consumer attention actually is, leading to ineffective marketing spend.

Corporate marketing often rewards media agencies for efficiency (low CPMs), but this is a false economy. Cheaper media is often low-quality, poorly placed, and unseen. The focus must shift from efficiency to effectiveness—paying for actual impact.

If a brand's media plan heavily favors bottom-funnel channels and looks the same as it did years ago, their measurement is flawed. This indicates they are over-crediting demand capture channels and ignoring the impact of upper-funnel activities that create initial interest.

Marketers and leaders often let their personal dislike for certain platforms (e.g., TikTok, pop-ups) prevent them from making smart business decisions. The only thing that matters is where your buyers are spending their time. Meet them there, regardless of your own preferences.

Many marketing departments favor billboards and TV ads, relying on 'fake reports' with inflated impressions. Meanwhile, social media, where brand and sales are actually built, remains underpriced and undervalued.

Solely judging marketing by last-touch attribution creates a false reality. This narrow metric consistently favors predictable channels like search and email, discouraging investment in brand building and creative storytelling that influence buyers throughout their journey. It's a losing battle if it's the only basis for decision-making.

Corporate Marketers Ignore Live Commerce Because Bonuses Are Tied to Outdated TV Metrics | RiffOn