Many large agencies are not truly consumer-centric. Their business model incentivizes focusing on winning industry awards (like Cannes Lions), pleasing internal stakeholders, and navigating corporate politics. This creates a fundamental disconnect from where consumer attention actually is, leading to ineffective marketing spend.
Agencies often pitch exciting, ambitious "North Star" campaigns that get one department excited. However, these ideas frequently fail because the client's internal teams (e.g., digital, PR, comms) are siloed and not aligned. The agency sells a vision that other departments ultimately block, leading to an inability to deliver.
The debate over ad "quality" is often based on subjective opinions of brand fit. A more effective definition of quality is its ability to achieve the primary business objective: selling the product. Unconventional creative that drives sales, like Olay's "cat with lasers" ad, is by definition high-quality.
As ad platforms like Google automate bid management, an agency's value is no longer in manual "button pushing." The new competitive edge is the ability to feed the platform's AI with superior client data and insights. Agencies that cannot access and leverage this data will struggle to demonstrate value.
The most significant marketing mistake is using data to push consumers down a brand-desired path they aren't interested in. It is far more effective to identify and build upon existing consumer behaviors. Forcing a misaligned journey is a waste of resources and alienates the customer base.
Leaders often choose expensive, traditional advertising for ego gratification, like a TV spot during a baseball game, over more effective and profitable digital platforms. This preference for the familiar methods of 'yesterday' stifles growth and wastes money in favor of personal validation.
The discussion over in-house versus agency marketing is a distraction from the fundamental problem. The core failure in most marketing today—from billboards to social posts—is a lack of strategic intent. Brands are simply 'posting shit' without a clear purpose, a flaw that exists regardless of who executes the work.
Strict adherence to brand cohesion often stifles creativity and results in subjective boardroom debates. Brands achieve more by focusing on creating relevant, timely content that resonates with their audience, even if it occasionally breaks established stylistic guidelines.
The traditional client service model is flawed because it forces ambitious creatives to seek approval from clients who often have lower creative standards and care less about the outcome. This dynamic inherently limits the potential of the work.
Marketers often equate effectiveness with ad ROI, but communications typically drive only 10% of sales. The other 90% is influenced by levers like pricing, distribution, and product performance. True marketing effectiveness requires a holistic view across all these business areas, not just advertising.
Amazon's holiday ad featuring sledding grandmothers was panned by industry press but deeply connected with audiences. This highlights a dangerous disconnect where the ad industry celebrates work for itself, rather than for its ability to tap into universal human truths that resonate with actual customers.