Paul Graham characterizes marketing strategies designed to intentionally anger people for attention as a tactic of "scammers." He argues that such approaches reveal a lack of long-term focus and earnest engineering, predicting that companies relying on these gimmicks will never become truly massive.

Even if 99% of a VC's portfolio is solid, one viral "rage bait" company can dominate public perception. Due to the internet's nature, this single controversial investment can get 1000x more attention, tarnishing the fund's brand and making it known for "slop" rather than its serious investments.

Using rage bait as a core product feature, rather than just a marketing tactic, actively repels the potential investors, customers, and talent a startup needs. Successful VC-backed companies must build a supportive coalition, which this strategy fundamentally undermines.

Oxford naming "rage bait" its word of the year signifies that intentionally provoking anger for online engagement is no longer a fringe tactic but a recognized, mainstream strategy. This reflects a maturation of the attention economy, where emotional manipulation has become a codified tool for content creators and digital marketers.

Startups like 'Chad IDE' are moving beyond using outrage for marketing. Their core product differentiation—like integrating gambling into a code editor—is the rage bait itself. This strategy risks alienating potential investors, customers, and talent, who may actively root for the company's downfall.

When an influential institution like YC promotes a company with a "rage bait" strategy on its official channels, it signals approval. This can mislead young, impressionable founders into believing such tactics are a necessary or endorsed path to success, potentially corrupting the startup ecosystem's norms.

The IVF company Nucleus ran a subway campaign with provocative slogans like 'Have your best baby' to deliberately anger a segment of the population. This 'rage bait' strategy manufactures virality in controversial industries, leveraging negative reactions to gain widespread attention that would otherwise be difficult to achieve.

A brand that tries to please everyone is memorable to no one. To build a truly strong brand, you must be willing to be disliked by some. Intentionally defining who your customer is *not* and creating polarizing content sharpens your identity, fostering a passionate community among those who love what you stand for.

While stunts and "rage-bait" can generate massive initial attention for a product like Clulee, their impact diminishes over time. Once an audience has been enraged, it's harder to provoke the same reaction again, making it a powerful but unsustainable long-term growth strategy compared to consistent value proposition advertising.