History demonstrates that dominance over seemingly mundane but critical resources is a foundational element of national power. The Roman Empire's control of salt and 19th-century America's pursuit of guano (bird fertilizer) laid the groundwork for their military and economic dominance.
Related Insights
The strategic competition with China is often viewed through a high-tech military lens, but its true power lies in dominating the low-tech supply chain. China can cripple other economies by simply withholding basic components like nuts, bolts, and screws, proving that industrial basics are a key geopolitical weapon.
For 30 years, China identified rare earths as a strategic industry. By massively subsidizing its own companies and dumping product to crash prices, it methodically drove US and global competitors out of business, successfully creating a coercive dependency for the rest of the world.
Openness is a tool for dominance, not just a moral virtue. The Romans became powerful by being strategically tolerant, quickly abandoning their own methods when they found better ones elsewhere. This allowed them to constantly upgrade their military, technology, and knowledge from conquered peoples.
Increased defense spending, geopolitical ambitions like buying Greenland, and strong GDP figures are creating significant tailwinds for the commodity complex. The primary investment strategy becomes aligning capital with government spending priorities, effectively front-running fiscal outflows.
China achieved its near-monopoly on rare earths not by chance, but through a long-term state-sponsored strategy. This involved providing capital to key firms, funding overseas acquisitions, banning foreign ownership of domestic mines, and consolidating the industry to control global prices.
China is restricting exports of essential rare earth minerals and EV battery manufacturing equipment. This is a strategic move to protect its global dominance in these critical industries, leveraging the fact that other countries have outsourced environmentally harmful mining to them for decades.
While media outlets create hype cycles around certain critical materials like rare earths, other equally vital commodities such as tungsten and tin face similar geopolitical supply risks but receive far less attention. These 'un-hyped' bottlenecks present significant investment opportunities for diligent researchers.
The strategic value of commodities in a modern portfolio has shifted from generating returns to providing a crucial hedge against two growing threats. These are unsustainable fiscal policies that weaken currencies ('debasement risk') and the increasing use of commodities as geopolitical weapons that cause supply disruptions.
By consolidating influence over Venezuelan and Guyanese reserves alongside its own, the U.S. could control nearly a third of global oil reserves. This would fundamentally reshape energy geopolitics, diminishing the influence of powers like Saudi Arabia and potentially keeping oil prices in a lower range.
Assets like launch capabilities, energy access, or media influence may not generate strong cash flows but provide immense strategic leverage. In an era of competing power blocs, controlling these strategic assets is becoming more valuable than traditional financial metrics suggest, a shift that markets struggle to price.
