Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Platform teams risk building generic solutions that don't truly solve anyone's problem. Square avoids this by having its platform organization also own and be responsible for specific product surfaces. This structure forces them to stay close to customer outcomes and build practical tools.

Related Insights

A significant maturity gap in large organizations is that internal platform PMs don't treat their users (e.g., developers, finance) as customers. Applying customer-centric practices like problem framing and journey mapping to these stakeholders can dramatically improve outcomes.

A platform's immediate user is the developer. However, to demonstrate true value, you must also understand and solve for the developer's end customer. This "two-hop" thinking is essential for connecting platform work to tangible business outcomes, not just internal technical improvements.

Square's product development is guided by the principle that "a seller should never outgrow Square." This forces them to build a platform that serves businesses from their first sale at a farmer's market all the way to operating in a large stadium, continuously adding capabilities to manage growing complexity.

Experienced product leaders avoid relying on muscle memory or applying a standard playbook. Each company, product space, and problem is unique. The most effective approach is to first understand the specific context and then select or create the right tools and frameworks for that unique situation.

Counter to typical scaling patterns, Square reverted from a business-unit model back to a functional one. They believed the General Manager structure diluted deep domain expertise, and a functional organization better preserves the "craft and excellence" within disciplines like product and engineering.

A horizontal platform that does everything can struggle with messaging. To solve this, "productize" the platform by identifying top use cases and creating dedicated bills of materials (decks, demos, content) to architect targeted demand generation campaigns for each.

Instead of creating bespoke features for individual clients, Aliaswire's product-centered culture prioritizes building solutions that can be replicated for thousands of customers. This architectural mindset turns specific sales opportunities into platform-wide leverage, delighting partners with unrequested but highly valuable new functions.

The market is shifting to platforms, but best-in-class point solutions (like Plaid for bank verification) remain critical. The winning strategy isn't to build everything, but to package these specialized services into a cohesive platform, leveraging their focused excellence for distribution and governance.

Contrary to typical platform strategy, Harness sells its modules separately. This prevents weak products from hiding inside a bundle and creates intense internal accountability. It forces each team to compete and win on its own merits, ensuring customers only buy what delivers real value.

To move from a project-based model to a scalable product, Irembo created two distinct teams. One team focused on building the core platform and its capabilities, while the other handled client-specific implementations using the platform, effectively managing the transition without disrupting delivery.

Prevent "One-Size-Fits-None" Platforms by Making Them Own Product Surfaces | RiffOn