While AI's technical capabilities advance exponentially, widespread organizational adoption is slowed by human factors like resistance to change, lack of urgency, and abstract understanding. This creates a significant gap between potential and reality.

The argument that AI adoption is slow due to normal tech diffusion is flawed. If AI models possessed true human-equivalent capabilities, they would be adopted faster than human employees because they could onboard instantly and eliminate hiring risks. The current lack of widespread economic value is direct evidence that today's AI models are not yet capable enough for broad deployment.

While AI's current impact on jobs is minimal, the *anticipation* of its future capabilities is creating a speculative drag on the labor market. Management teams, aware of hiring and firing costs, are becoming cautious about adding staff whose roles might be automated within 6-12 months.

Despite marketing hype, current AI agents are not fully autonomous and cannot replace an entire human job. They excel at executing a sequence of defined tasks to achieve a specific goal, like research, but lack the complex reasoning for broader job functions. True job replacement is likely still years away.

The argument is that "economic diffusion lag" is an excuse for AI's current limitations. If AI models were truly as capable as human employees, they would integrate into companies instantly—far faster than human hiring. The slow rollout proves they still lack core, necessary skills for broad economic value.

The slow adoption of AI isn't due to a natural 'diffusion lag' but is evidence that models still lack core competencies for broad economic value. If AI were as capable as skilled humans, it would integrate into businesses almost instantly.

The narrative "AI will take your job" is misleading. The reality is companies will replace employees who refuse to adopt AI with those who can leverage it for massive productivity gains. Non-adoption is a career-limiting choice.

There is a brief grace period, estimated at about one year, for workers to learn and integrate AI into their roles. After this window, companies will actively seek to replace employees who haven't become significantly more efficient with AI tools, as the productivity gap will be too large to ignore.

There is a significant gap between how companies talk about using AI and their actual implementation. While many leaders claim to be "AI-driven," real-world application is often limited to superficial tasks like social media content, not deep, transformative integration into core business processes.