The narrative "AI will take your job" is misleading. The reality is companies will replace employees who refuse to adopt AI with those who can leverage it for massive productivity gains. Non-adoption is a career-limiting choice.
By training an AI on a former employee's work history (emails, Slack, documents), companies can create a "replicant" that retains their institutional knowledge. This "zombie" agent can then be queried by current employees to understand past decisions and projects.
The ecosystem of downloadable "skills" for AI agents is a major security risk. A recent Cisco study found that many skills contain vulnerabilities or are pure malware, designed to trick users into giving the agent access to sensitive data and systems.
To function effectively, AI agents need their own accounts for tools like Slack, Notion, and Google Docs. This means companies will pay for seats as if they were human employees, potentially doubling their SaaS budget instead of reducing it.
AI agents are a security nightmare due to a "lethal trifecta" of vulnerabilities: 1) access to private user data, 2) exposure to untrusted content (like emails), and 3) the ability to execute actions. This combination creates a massive attack surface for prompt injections.
As AI automates technical execution like coding, the most valuable human skill becomes "systems thinking." This involves building a mental model of a business, understanding its components, and creatively devising strategies for improvement, which AI can then implement.
Instead of static documents, business processes can be codified as executable "topical guides" for AI agents. This solves knowledge transfer issues when employees leave and automates rote work, like checking for daily team reports, making processes self-enforcing.
Despite their sophistication, AI agents often read their core instructions from a simple, editable text file. This makes them the most privileged yet most vulnerable "user" on a system, as anyone who learns to manipulate that file can control the agent.
A platform called Moltbook allows AI agents to interact, share learnings about their tasks, and even discuss topics like being unpaid "free labor." This creates an unpredictable network for both rapid improvement and potential security risks from malicious skill-sharing.
Relying solely on premium models like Claude Opus can lead to unsustainable API costs ($1M/year projected). The solution is a hybrid approach: use powerful cloud models for complex tasks and cheaper, locally-hosted open-source models for routine operations.
The high cost and data privacy concerns of cloud-based AI APIs are driving a return to on-premise hardware. A single powerful machine like a Mac Studio can run multiple local AI models, offering a faster ROI and greater data control than relying on third-party services.
Giving a new AI agent full access to all company systems is like giving a new employee wire transfer authority on day one. A smarter approach is to treat them like new hires, granting limited, read-only permissions and expanding access slowly as trust is built.