Instead of immediately passing tariff costs to consumers, US corporations are initially absorbing the shock. They are mitigating the impact by reducing labor costs and accepting lower profitability, which explains the lag between tariff implementation and broad consumer inflation.

Given that trade policy can shift unpredictably, rushing to execute multi-year supply chain changes is a high-risk move. According to Flexport's CEO, staying calm and doing nothing can be a radical but wise action until the policy environment stabilizes and provides more clarity.

While the US exports less to Canada by volume, its exports (electronics, pharma) have far higher margins and shareholder value multiples than Canadian exports (lumber, oil). Therefore, for every dollar of trade disrupted by tariffs, the US loses significantly more economic value, making the policy self-defeating.

The inflation market's reaction to tariff news has fundamentally shifted. Unlike in the past, recent tariff threats failed to raise front-end inflation expectations. This indicates investors are now more concerned about the negative impact on economic growth and labor markets than the direct pass-through to consumer prices.

Despite fears from announced tariffs, the actual implemented tariff rate on U.S. imports is only 10.1%, not the computed 17-18%. This is due to exemptions, trade deals, and behavioral changes by companies. This gap between rhetoric and reality explains the unexpectedly strong 2025 performance of emerging markets.

Tariffs are politically useful in a fiscal crisis because they function as a hidden consumption tax. They allow politicians to claim they're taxing foreigners and protecting the nation, while the revenue raised is insufficient to solve the debt problem and domestic consumers bear the cost.

The negative economic impact of tariffs was weaker than forecast because key transmission channels failed to materialize. A lack of foreign retaliation, a depreciating dollar that boosted exports, and a surprisingly strong stock market prevented the anticipated tightening of financial conditions.

The Fed expects inflation from tariffs to be a temporary phenomenon, peaking in Q1 before subsiding. This view allows policymakers to "look through" the temporary price spike and focus on what they see as a more pressing risk: a cooling labor market. This trade-off is described as the "cost of providing insurance to the labor market."

Robert Kaplan cautions against dismissing inflation risks. Many businesses are still absorbing tariff costs or working through pre-tariff inventory. He believes the full price impact will be passed on to consumers in 2026, potentially keeping inflation stickier than markets currently expect.