In a highly collaborative and fast-paced environment, assign explicit ownership for every feature, no matter how small. The goal isn't to assign blame for failures but to empower individuals with the agency to make decisions, build consensus, and see their work through to completion.

Teams often mistake compromise for collaboration, leading to average outcomes. True collaboration requires balancing high assertiveness (people speaking their mind directly) with high cooperativeness (openly listening to others). It is not about meeting in the middle.

Engineering often defaults to a 'project mindset,' focusing on churning out features and measuring velocity. True alignment with product requires a 'product mindset,' which prioritizes understanding the customer and tracking the value being delivered, not just the output.

Go-to-market success isn't just about high-performing marketing, sales, and CS teams. The true differentiator is the 'connective tissue'—shared ICP definitions, terminology, and smooth handoffs. This alignment across functions, where one team's actions directly impact the next, is where most organizations break down.

Similar to technical debt, "narrative debt" accrues when teams celebrate speed and output while neglecting shared understanding. This gap registers as momentum, not risk, making the system fragile while metrics still look healthy.

When a project stagnates, it's often because "everyone's accountable, which means no one's accountable." To combat this diffusion of responsibility, assign one "single-threaded owner" who is publicly responsible for reporting progress and triaging issues. This clarity, combined with assigning individual names to action items, fosters true ownership.

Product leaders often try to implement agile best practices within their team, but fail because the surrounding organization still operates on a project-based model. The rest of the company treats the product team like a feature factory, handing over requests and demanding deadlines, creating immense internal friction.

In a project-led model, teams disband after launch, leaving the product without a steward until a new project is initiated. A product-led model uses long-standing teams to own the product's entire lifecycle, ensuring it continuously delivers value and is never left unattended.

The primary source of friction between product and project functions isn't a lack of skills but rather unclear ownership, siloed planning, and conflicting success metrics. The solution is proactive, early alignment on roles, tools, and a shared definition of success.