By vowing to rely less on academics and experts, a news organization creates an excuse to platform misinformation and popular opinion over earned, fact-based knowledge, effectively replacing merit with trending topics.

Related Insights

According to Van Jones, cable news has pivoted from breaking news to manufacturing conflict. The primary goal is no longer live reporting but creating contentious segments designed to be clipped and go viral on social media, fundamentally changing the business.

The primary function of cable news has shifted. It no longer breaks news but instead produces segments specifically designed to be clipped and go viral on social media platforms. Its main impact is now on the broader internet conversation, not its direct viewership.

The erosion of trusted, centralized news sources by social media creates an information vacuum. This forces people into a state of 'conspiracy brain,' where they either distrust all information or create flawed connections between unverified data points.

Critical media narratives targeting experienced tech leaders in government aim to intimidate future experts from public service. By framing deep industry experience as an inherent conflict of interest, these stories create a vacuum filled by less-qualified academics and career politicians, ultimately harming the quality of policymaking.

Simply stating that conventional wisdom is wrong is a weak "gotcha" tactic. A more robust approach involves investigating the ecosystem that created the belief, specifically the experts who established it, and identifying their incentives or biases, which often reveals why flawed wisdom persists.

In a polarized media environment, audiences increasingly judge news as biased if it doesn't reflect their own opinions. This creates a fundamental challenge for public media outlets aiming for objectivity, as their down-the-middle approach can be cast as politically hostile by partisans who expect their views to be validated.

Experts lose public trust not only from being wrong, but from being 'dangerously out of touch.' Their use of cold, impersonal jargon like 'transition costs' to describe devastating life events like job loss displays a lack of empathy, making their advice seem disconnected from human reality and easy to reject.

A two-step analytical method to vet information: First, distinguish objective (multi-source, verifiable) facts from subjective (opinion-based) claims. Second, assess claims on a matrix of probability and source reliability. A low-reliability source making an improbable claim, like many conspiracy theories, should be considered highly unlikely.

CBS News acquiring Bari Weiss signals a strategic shift: legacy media outlets are buying influential independent creators to regain credibility. As audiences increasingly trust individual voices over institutions, these giants are co-opting top creators to bring that trust—and their audiences—back under a corporate umbrella, reversing the traditional talent pipeline.

The promise of new media was to foster deep, nuanced conversations that legacy outlets abandoned. However, it is increasingly falling into the same traps: becoming predictable, obsessed with personality feuds, and chasing clicks with inflammatory content instead of pursuing truth.