An internal B2B community often fails because leadership doesn't give it enough time and inevitably ties its success to short-term sales metrics. When pipeline is down, the community becomes a target for lead generation, which breaks member trust and destroys its value.
Most B2B companies have a massive blind spot in the poorly tracked period before an opportunity is created. This "black box" of pre-pipeline activity prevents leaders from diagnosing what is truly working, leading to flat growth and inefficient spending.
Contrary to popular belief, launching a private community (like a Slack or Circle group) is often a mistake. Without dedicated management and clear value, they quickly devolve into spam and noise, ultimately failing. It's a high-effort initiative that is not suitable for most businesses.
The primary reason new outbound initiatives fail is not a bad channel mix or messaging, but a lack of leadership commitment leading to "fits and starts." Companies quit before the cumulative impact of prospecting can materialize because they expect instant results. Success requires an unwavering organizational commitment to sustained, daily activity despite initial low returns.
CMO Ben Schechter argues that tracking raw lead count is a dangerous metric. A marketing leader can easily manipulate lead scoring to hit a volume target, flooding sales with low-quality prospects. This erodes sales team trust and causes them to stop following up on all marketing-generated leads.
The most powerful form of community isn't a walled-off Slack group. It's about becoming the 'host of the party' for a specific audience's shared interests. Companies like HubSpot built a community around 'inbound marketing' by owning the conversation, long before they had private user groups.
When reps avoid opening opportunities or refuse to close-lose deals, it signals a culture of fear where they believe they will be blamed for losses. This isn't a process issue. Leadership must explicitly create a culture where data is for learning, not blaming individuals.
The metric for a successful community has shifted from high activity ("noise") to high trust. Members no longer want to sift through hundreds of discussions. They want a smaller, curated space where they can trust the expertise and intentions of the other people in the room.
To prevent a community from becoming a sales-driven failure, consider charging for access. This reframes it as a standalone product with its own P&L, forcing genuine investment and protecting it from the short-term pipeline pressure that corrupts its purpose and value.
Companies stay stuck in failing models for three reasons: 1) The system rewards controllable but ineffective activity (more calls, more MQLs). 2) Leaders fear the perceived risk of foundational change. 3) A culture of urgency favors quick tactical fixes over addressing deep, systemic issues.
Shift from viewing a community as a side project to treating it as a core product. This means implementing a product owner, roadmap, features, feedback loops, and key metrics like NPS to ensure it's continuously improving and not just a creator's side project.