We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
When high performers undermine culture despite receiving top accolades and compensation, it's often a cry for personal recognition. They may not want another trophy; they want a leader to take them to lunch and sincerely say, "We love you. You're amazing."
Most managers are conditioned to spot errors. A more powerful strategy, inspired by Ken Blanchard, is to actively "catch people doing the right thing" and praise it. This builds an emotional bank account, reinforces desired behaviors, and improves culture far more effectively than constant correction.
Don't hold elite performers to the same activity metrics as the rest of the team. Instead, grant them autonomy while explicitly stating they are not exempt from being a team player. This builds trust and respect, allowing them to focus on results without undermining team morale.
Indra Nooyi built deep, personal loyalty by writing letters directly to the parents of her top 400 executives, thanking them for raising such exceptional individuals. This unconventional act of recognition acknowledged the employee as a whole person with a support system, forging a powerful, human bond that transcended the typical employer-employee relationship.
Managers often spend disproportionate energy on low-performing employees. The highest-leverage activity is to actively invest in your top performers. Don't just leave them alone because they're doing well; run experiments by giving them bigger, more visible projects to unlock their full potential and create future leaders.
A highly successful salesperson, unmotivated by money, was reignited by a specific, tangible goal: a Harley Davidson his wife wouldn't let him buy. This shows that the motivational trigger for top performers can be surprisingly small and personal once financial security is achieved.
To gauge if your culture supports momentum, observe your top performers during a colleague's celebration. True A-players will be at the front, celebrating. If they're resentful in the back, you have a culture of 'I-centered' individuals that will kill collective momentum.
A kind culture must be actively protected. How a company handles high-performing but unkind employees reveals its true values. Prioritizing cultural integrity by addressing or removing these individuals sends a powerful signal that kindness is non-negotiable, even at a potential short-term cost.
Appreciation values who someone is, and recognition values what they do. But affirmation is superior because it reveals *how* someone's unique gifts create a unique impact. It provides "indisputable evidence of their significance," which is more motivating.
A manager's highest duty is to an employee's fulfillment, not just their performance. When a top performer is not personally aligned with their role, a leader should actively help them find a better fit—even if it means using their own social capital to place them at another organization.
The Ringelmann effect shows that individual effort declines in groups where personal contribution feels non-essential. To make people feel irreplaceable, leaders must explicitly state their unique value and impact, often by simply saying, "If it wasn't for you..."