Despite being the indispensable public face of the viral brand, host Scott Rogowsky was offered a mere quarter-point of equity. This starkly illustrates how tech-focused startups can critically undervalue non-technical, forward-facing talent, creating misalignment and risking the loss of key personnel.
Related Insights
A founder's refusal to grant equity is the primary reason service firms fail to scale and mitigate "key person risk." To attract top talent that can grow the business independently, founders must make employees actual owners. People will only act like owners if they are owners, and equity is the only way to achieve that alignment.
The founders of HQ Trivia, who came from the tech platform Vine, didn't understand how to manage on-screen talent. This created tension and instability, highlighting the need for domain-specific leadership in media-tech hybrid companies where on-camera personalities are central to the product.
Don't give away half your company to a "business person" who handles administrative tasks. A non-technical co-founder must possess and execute on the most valuable skills in a SaaS business: sales and marketing. Otherwise, they don't deserve co-founder level equity.
The implosion of AI startup Thinking Machines highlights a critical risk: deep-tech companies require CEOs with profound technical expertise. Top researchers are motivated by working on hard problems with visionary technical leaders, and a non-technical CEO struggles to attract and retain this S-tier talent.
A business transitions from a founder-dependent "practice" to a scalable "enterprise" only when the founder shares wealth and recognition. Failing to provide equity and public credit prevents attracting and retaining the talent needed for growth, as top performers will leave to become owners themselves.
For a high-skill service business, the biggest barrier to scaling is finding autonomous, high-quality employees. To retain this crucial talent and prevent them from leaving to start a competing business, founders should offer an equity stake that vests over a long period (e.g., 5-6 years), aligning their incentives with the company's long-term growth.
Chasing high, unrealized valuations is dangerous. It makes common stock prohibitively expensive, undermining the potential for life-changing wealth for employees—a key recruiting tool. It also narrows a company's strategic options, locking it into a high-stakes path where anything less than exceeding the last valuation is seen as failure.
Granting a full co-founder 50% equity is a massive, often regrettable, early decision. A better model is to bring on a 'partner' with a smaller, vested equity stake (e.g., 10%). This provides accountability and complementary skills without sacrificing majority ownership and control.
A service company's primary asset is its people. To prevent your best talent from leaving and becoming competitors, you must give them significant equity. This transforms their mindset from employee to owner, aligning their interests with the firm's long-term success and growth.
Founders often assume employees share their risk appetite for equity, but this is a mistake. When offered a choice between a higher cash salary and a mix of cash and equity, the vast majority of employees will choose the guaranteed cash, revealing a fundamental aversion to risk.
