Despite massive scouting departments, NFL teams' ability to judge talent is barely better than a coin flip. The probability that a player selected at any given position is better than the very next player chosen is only 53%. This demonstrates massive overconfidence in expert judgment and explains why top draft picks are often not the most valuable.
Related Insights
To manage the uncertainty of an athlete's draft position, specialized lenders calculate a projected draft value by averaging multiple "big boards" and then applying a downward standard deviation. They further mitigate risk by lending a maximum of only 10% of this conservative, de-risked projection, ensuring a high margin of safety.
A 2022 study by the Forecasting Research Institute has been reviewed, revealing that top forecasters and AI experts significantly underestimated AI advancements. They assigned single-digit odds to breakthroughs that occurred within two years, proving we are consistently behind the curve in our predictions.
Top tennis players like Rafael Nadal win only ~55% of total points but triumph by winning the *important* ones. This analogy illustrates that successful investing isn't about being right every time. It's about consistently tilting small odds in your favor across many bets, like a casino, to ensure long-term success.
The market for financial forecasts is driven by a psychological need to reduce uncertainty, not a demand for accuracy. Pundits who offer confident, black-and-white predictions thrive because they soothe this anxiety. This is why the industry persists despite a terrible track record; it's selling a feeling, not a result.
![[REPLAY] Morgan Housel – Same as Ever (EP.359) thumbnail](https://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/f/b/7/6/fb76e1c8bfb69e8dd959afa2a1bf1c87/CA_Square_logo_light_background_6.26.24.jpg){kind=logo}
High-profile sports franchises defy standard financial analysis. Their valuation is driven more by their scarcity and desirability as a "trophy asset," similar to a masterpiece painting. This makes them a store of value where the underlying business fundamentals are only part of the equation.
Similar to professional sports, the asset management industry has become hyper-competitive. As the baseline skill level of all participants becomes exceptionally high, the difference between them narrows. This makes random chance, or luck, a larger determinant of who wins in any given deal or fund cycle, making repeatable alpha harder.
The concept of the 'Winner's Curse'—where the winner in an auction often overpays—originated in industry, not academia. Engineers at Atlantic Richfield (ARCO) discovered that the oil leases they successfully bid on consistently underperformed expectations, realizing the winning bid is by nature the most optimistic and therefore often inaccurate.
In auctions with uncertain value (like oil leases or even NFL draft picks), the winner is not a random bidder but the one with the most optimistic valuation. This often means the winner has significantly overestimated the item's true worth and is therefore 'cursed' by their victory.
The most valuable skill from scouting isn't talent evaluation, but developing a "BS detector" from interviewing hundreds of prospects. Cross-referencing claims and watching people act in their self-interest provides a powerful lesson in the human element of due diligence and the overriding power of incentives.
For decades, the math proved a 40% three-point shot was more valuable than a 50% two-point shot. Yet, the NBA was incredibly slow to adopt this strategy. This highlights how even high-stakes, data-rich industries can be slaves to tradition and status quo bias, ignoring obvious quantitative advantages.