Many leaders are held back by seven common beliefs they mistake for strengths: 'I need to be involved,' 'I know I'm right,' 'I can't make a mistake,' 'I can't say no,' etc. These are not character flaws but outdated success strategies. Identifying which belief is driving unproductive patterns is the first step toward unblocking potential.

The greatest performers, from athletes to companies, are not just the most talented; they are the best at getting better faster. An obsession with root-cause analysis and a non-defensive commitment to improvement is the key to reaching otherwise unachievable levels of success.

High-achievers often have a mental block against simple solutions, subconsciously believing that important work must feel hard. This prevents them from even searching for easier paths like delegation or automation. To overcome this, reframe problems from “How can I do this?” to “Who or what could do this for me?”

Instead of waiting for a postmortem after failing, conduct a 'premortem' at the start. Proactively contemplating the specific obstacles that might prevent you from achieving your goals is a critical first step. This pessimistic-sounding exercise allows you to identify barriers like impulsivity or laziness and design solutions for them.

Just as PMs are warned against solution-bias, the same discipline applies to problems. The goal is not just to find one problem, but to find multiple, then assess which is most valuable, strategically aligned, and worth pursuing for the right audience before committing resources.

Experts often view problems through the narrow lens of their own discipline, a cognitive bias known as the "expertise trap" or Maslow's Law. This limits the tools and perspectives applied, leading to suboptimal solutions. The remedy is intentional collaboration with individuals who possess different functional toolkits.

Author Eduardo Briseño introduces the 'Performance Paradox': focusing only on execution and minimizing mistakes keeps you stagnant. The highest achievers do not improve simply by doing their job more. They deliberately step out of the high-stakes 'performance zone' to work on their weaknesses in a 'learning zone', which ultimately fuels superior performance.

Before starting a project, ask the team to imagine it has failed and write a story explaining why. This exercise in 'time travel' bypasses optimism bias and surfaces critical operational risks, resource gaps, and flawed assumptions that would otherwise be missed until it's too late.

Founders from backgrounds like consulting or top universities often have a cognitive bias that "things will just work out." In startups, the default outcome is failure. This mindset must be replaced by recognizing that only intense, consistent execution of uncomfortable tasks can alter this trajectory.