Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

A VC may recall a single contribution as pivotal, while a founder barely remembers it. This disconnect is normal. For a founder juggling countless daily tasks over a decade, a VC's intervention, however helpful at the time, often fades into the background noise of building a company.

Related Insights

Echoing the Hippocratic Oath, a venture investor's primary job with a high-performing company is to stay out of the way and not disrupt its momentum. While providing resources for talent, capital, and strategy is valuable, it's secondary to the core principle of not interfering with a team that is already executing successfully.

Drawing an analogy to legendary music producer Rick Rubin, an investor's role is to help a founder find the most authentic and compelling version of their own story. The goal is not to invent a narrative, but to draw out the founder's core truth and channel it through their company.

The abundance of capital has shifted the VC mindset from serving founders over a decade to simply "winning" the next hot deal. This transactional approach is misaligned with what founders truly need: a committed, long-term partner who puts the company first.

An estimated 60% of VCs harm their portfolio companies by pushing a 'burn at all costs' mentality or pretending to know how to run the business. The best VCs are humble connectors who link founders with people who have successfully navigated similar growth stages before.

Beyond capital, a VC's network and operational support serve a key psychological function. By providing access to key hires, customers, and government officials, the firm builds a founder's confidence, putting them in a 'virtuous cycle' to make faster, better decisions and transition from inventor to CEO.

The most valuable role for a board member isn't giving advice, but acting as a "sparring partner." This involves asking sharp questions that help founders surface their own insights and gain clarity on ideas they already hold, especially when navigating uncharted territory.

Competing to be a founder's "first call" is a crowded, zero-sum game. A more effective strategy is to be the "second call"—the specialist a founder turns to for a specific, difficult problem after consulting their lead investor. This positioning is more scalable, collaborative, and allows for differentiated value-add.

Katelin Holloway notes an ironic VC behavior: investors are often absent during the difficult early grind but flock to a company once it's clearly succeeding. They want to be associated with the “rocket ship,” but this is the moment founders need their help the least. True value is delivered during the struggle.

An investor's power over a portfolio company is fundamentally limited and primarily negative. While a VC can block a founder's actions, such as through board approval or withholding capital, they cannot force a founder to take a specific path, even if it seems obviously correct. The role is to advise and assist, not to command or execute.

A VC has truly succeeded when a founder, in retrospect, feels they were like a co-founder. This signifies a deep, proximate, and unconditional partnership that went beyond transactions or advice, providing existential support through the company's entire journey.