Breakthroughs often come from systematically testing a high volume of possibilities, not from a single brilliant insight. Edison tested 6,000 filaments to find one that worked. This redefines resilience not as mere persistence, but as a deliberate strategy to run more experiments than anyone else.
Related Insights
True innovation isn't about brainstorming endless ideas, but about methodically de-risking a concept in the correct order. The crucial first step is achieving problem clarity. Teams often fail by jumping to solutions before they have sufficiently reduced uncertainty about the core problem.
Starting with limitations like budget and feasibility (convergent thinking) kills growth and leads to repetitive outcomes. You must begin with an expansive, divergent phase to generate a wide pool of ideas before applying any constraints.
True innovation requires leaders to adopt a venture capital mindset, accepting that roughly nine out of ten initiatives will fail. This high tolerance for failure, mirroring professional investment odds, is a prerequisite for the psychological safety needed for breakthrough results.
Contrary to the startup myth of a sudden breakthrough, successful Harvard Business School founders engaged in a deliberate ideation process over weeks or months. They systematically evaluated, vetted, and shaped multiple ideas before committing, proving that great ideas are built, not found.
For ambitious 'moonshot' projects, the vast majority of time and effort (90%) is spent on learning, exploration, and discovering the right thing to build. The actual construction is a small fraction (10%) of the total work. This reframes failure as a critical and expected part of the learning process.
The vast majority of people and businesses fail because they break emotionally under the relentless pressure of failure. The key to success is not brilliance but emotional resilience. The winner is often the one who can simply stand to iterate on failure longer than anyone else.
Diller’s process for navigating the unknown isn't about brilliance but relentless iteration. He describes it as taking "one dumb step" at a time, bouncing off the walls of bad ideas and mistakes, and course-correcting. This embraces looking foolish as a prerequisite for finding the right path.
Society celebrates figures like Edison for the 'idea' of the lightbulb, but his real breakthrough was in manufacturing a practical version. Similarly, Elon Musk's genius is arguably in revolutionizing manufacturing to lower space travel costs, a feat of logistics often overlooked in favor of visionary narratives.
Their success isn't from brilliant ideas, but from a massive volume of experiments. By trying dozens of new promotions and social media posts weekly, they accept a high failure rate to learn faster than any competitor. This contrasts with the typical corporate playbook of repeating safe, proven tactics.
The most successful founders rarely get the solution right on their first attempt. Their strength lies in persistence combined with adaptability. They treat their initial ideas as hypotheses, take in new data, and are willing to change their approach repeatedly to find what works.
