As multiple new drugs like antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) become available for SCLC, the critical research question will shift from *if* they work to *when* they should be used. Future biomarker strategies must focus on optimizing treatment sequences, considering factors like the drug's target and payload.

The North Star study shows local therapy like radiation or surgery improves survival in stage IV patients on osimertinib, but only if every site of residual disease is treated. Treating some but not all spots provides no additional benefit over standard TKI therapy.

Standard Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) reports often just state "MET amplification" without a specific copy number. To make informed treatment decisions with MET inhibitors, clinicians must proactively contact the testing company's molecular pathology department to obtain this crucial, unlisted data point.

Features like brain metastases or p53 co-mutations are considered high-risk. However, about 75% of patients have at least one such factor, making the "high-risk" profile the norm, not the exception, and reinforcing the need for upfront combination therapy.

Contrary to the standard 'TKI-first' approach for driver mutations, a study in MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC suggests a different strategy. Patients with high PD-L1 expression appeared to have better outcomes with first-line chemoimmunotherapy, reserving the targeted therapy for later. This challenges the conventional wisdom of prioritizing the driver mutation over immunotherapy biomarkers in this specific subgroup.

In the HARMONY A study, Ivanesimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients. This is notable because prior trials showed that adding standard PD-1 inhibitors to chemotherapy was ineffective for this specific patient population.

Before the LAURA trial, oncologists had strong data for using EGFR TKIs in metastatic and resectable settings but lacked evidence for the unresectable Stage 3 population receiving chemoradiation. LAURA filled this "awkward gap," confirming a long-held suspicion and harmonizing treatment strategy across disease stages.

The panel suggests AKT inhibitor trials in prostate cancer have been disappointing due to suboptimal biomarker selection (e.g., PTEN IHC). A similar drug in breast cancer showed significant survival benefit when using a more precise NGS-based strategy, indicating a potential path forward if the right patient population is identified genetically.

Unlike immunotherapy, neoadjuvant osimertinib yields poor pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. However, it significantly improves major pathologic response (MPR) and survival, suggesting pCR may be the wrong efficacy endpoint for cytostatic EGFR TKIs, which have a different mechanism of action than immunotherapy.