For N2+ EGFR-mutant NSCLC, clinicians now face a choice. Combining neoadjuvant osimertinib with chemotherapy is potent and gets treatment done upfront, but osimertinib monotherapy is better tolerated, reducing the risk of toxicity that could prevent a patient from reaching their planned surgery.
A sobering finding from the LAURA trial was its control arm. EGFR-mutant patients receiving standard "curative-intent" chemoradiation alone had extremely high and rapid relapse rates (PFS ~6 months), highlighting the inadequacy of this standard and underscoring the necessity of adding consolidation osimertinib.
Unlike immunotherapy, neoadjuvant osimertinib yields poor pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. However, it significantly improves major pathologic response (MPR) and survival, suggesting pCR may be the wrong efficacy endpoint for cytostatic EGFR TKIs, which have a different mechanism of action than immunotherapy.
Before the LAURA trial, oncologists had strong data for using EGFR TKIs in metastatic and resectable settings but lacked evidence for the unresectable Stage 3 population receiving chemoradiation. LAURA filled this "awkward gap," confirming a long-held suspicion and harmonizing treatment strategy across disease stages.
The success of perioperative osimertinib means oncologists cannot choose the optimal strategy (targeted therapy vs. chemoimmunotherapy) for resectable lung cancer without first knowing the patient's EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 status. This elevates biomarker profiling from a metastatic-setting tool to a critical first step in early-stage disease.