We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
In the HARMONY A study, Ivanesimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients. This is notable because prior trials showed that adding standard PD-1 inhibitors to chemotherapy was ineffective for this specific patient population.
The bispecific antibody Ivanesimab binds to the VEGF dimer, creating a "daisy chain" of antibody-VEGF complexes. This multimerization concentrates the drug in the tumor microenvironment, where VEGF is high, and enhances its ability to bind and block PD-1 more effectively than single-molecule approaches.
Synthakyne's drug demonstrated a 75% response rate in lung cancer patients with STK11 and KEAP1 mutations, a subgroup where the published response rate for standard care is only 7%. This suggests the drug is highly effective in the most immunologically resistant patient populations, a significant differentiator.
Data from the Podium-303 trial's crossover arm suggests that waiting to use a PD-1 inhibitor after progression on chemotherapy is less effective than using it concurrently from the start. This supports the synergistic effect of chemo-immunotherapy and favors the concurrent approach as the standard of care.
The rationale for developing Sigvotatug Vedotin extends beyond its direct cytotoxic effect. Preclinical data shows that blocking the IB6 pathway can increase the potency of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, suggesting a powerful synergistic effect that could lead to highly effective future combination therapies.
The failure of the concurrent chemo-immuno-radiation approach has not stalled progress. Instead, new clinical trials are actively exploring novel strategies like SBRT boosts, dual checkpoint inhibitors, radiosensitizing nanoparticles, and induction immunotherapy to improve upon the current standard of care.
The HARMONY-2 study showed Ivanesimab delivered a median progression-free survival of 11.3 months compared to 5.8 months for Pembrolizumab in PD-L1 positive NSCLC. Analysis confirmed Pembrolizumab performed as expected, suggesting the dual VEGF/PD-1 blockade provides a genuinely superior clinical benefit over PD-1 inhibition alone.
Before the LAURA trial, oncologists had strong data for using EGFR TKIs in metastatic and resectable settings but lacked evidence for the unresectable Stage 3 population receiving chemoradiation. LAURA filled this "awkward gap," confirming a long-held suspicion and harmonizing treatment strategy across disease stages.
The success of perioperative osimertinib means oncologists cannot choose the optimal strategy (targeted therapy vs. chemoimmunotherapy) for resectable lung cancer without first knowing the patient's EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 status. This elevates biomarker profiling from a metastatic-setting tool to a critical first step in early-stage disease.
Unlike immunotherapy, neoadjuvant osimertinib yields poor pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. However, it significantly improves major pathologic response (MPR) and survival, suggesting pCR may be the wrong efficacy endpoint for cytostatic EGFR TKIs, which have a different mechanism of action than immunotherapy.
For N2+ EGFR-mutant NSCLC, clinicians now face a choice. Combining neoadjuvant osimertinib with chemotherapy is potent and gets treatment done upfront, but osimertinib monotherapy is better tolerated, reducing the risk of toxicity that could prevent a patient from reaching their planned surgery.