Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Launching experiments without prior customer interviews or market analysis is a waste of resources. The most effective experiments are designed to answer specific questions that arise from a solid research foundation, not to substitute for it.

Related Insights

The process of user research, such as conducting interviews, can become overvalued. The ultimate objective is to build good products that solve real problems for people. The methods used to achieve that outcome are secondary to the outcome itself.

Many marketers equate CRO with just A/B testing. However, a successful program is built on two pillars: research (gathering quantitative and qualitative data) and testing (experimentation). Overlooking the research phase leads to uninformed tests and poor results, as it provides the necessary insights for what to test.

Large companies often identify an opportunity, create a solution based on an unproven assumption, and ship it without validating market demand. This leads to costly failures when the product doesn't solve a real user need, wasting millions of dollars and significant time.

Shifting the conversation from "moving faster" to "investing wisely" helps get stakeholder buy-in. It highlights that experiments prevent wasting significant time and money on suboptimal or failing ideas, making it a powerful risk management tool.

Early demos shouldn't be used to ask, "Did we build the right thing?" Instead, present them to customers to test your core assumptions and ask, "Did we understand your problem correctly?" This reframes feedback, focusing on the root cause before investing heavily in a specific solution.

The ease of AI development tools tempts founders to build products immediately. A more effective approach is to first use AI for deep market research and GTM strategy validation. This prevents wasting time building a product that nobody wants.

Instead of only testing minor changes on a finished product, like button color, use A/B testing early in the development process. This allows you to validate broad behavioral science principles, such as social proof, for your specific challenge before committing to a full build.

To truly learn from go-to-market experiments, you can't be half-hearted. StackAI's philosophy is to dedicate significant, focused effort for 1-3 months on a single idea. This ensures that if it fails, you know it's the idea, not poor execution, providing a definitive learning.

A research project intended for content can reveal that your target audience doesn't actually perceive the problem your product solves. This finding can force a fundamental pivot in your entire go-to-market strategy, including messaging and target customer profile, making it more than just a marketing asset.

Before launching a research project, marketing teams must make a critical strategic decision. Is the goal to design a survey that gathers data to back up a pre-existing company point of view? Or is it to go in agnostically and genuinely discover what the market thinks, even if it proves you wrong?