Before launching a research project, marketing teams must make a critical strategic decision. Is the goal to design a survey that gathers data to back up a pre-existing company point of view? Or is it to go in agnostically and genuinely discover what the market thinks, even if it proves you wrong?

Related Insights

The common advice to conduct unbiased discovery interviews sounds logical but often fails. The truest way to validate an idea and understand customer needs is through the act of selling. This forces a concrete value exchange and reveals genuine demand in a way that hypothetical conversations cannot.

When research stalls, the bottleneck is often not the methodology or recruiting but a lack of internal consensus on the target audience. The first step should always be audience definition. If the team can't agree, then the initial research project must be to define and validate the audience itself.

Effective CRO research goes beyond analytics. It requires gathering data across two spectrums: quantitative (what's happening) vs. qualitative (why it's happening), and behavioral (user actions) vs. perceptive (user thoughts/feelings). This dual-spectrum approach provides a complete picture for informed decision-making.

Marketers frequently fail by assuming their target audience thinks, feels, and behaves as they do. The fundamental principle for success is to constantly remember this fallacy and instead get out to meet and understand the actual customer.

Even expert storytellers can fail to extract a coherent narrative from thousands of raw survey responses. A content marketer's most crucial partner in an original research project is a data analyst who can dig into the numbers, identify statistically significant findings, and surface the stories hidden in the data.

Unlike sales-led companies that get feedback from sales calls, PLG companies are blind to their competitive positioning without formal research. You must conduct jobs-to-be-done interviews to uncover why customers chose you over alternatives, as relying on internal assumptions or simple "what do you love" surveys is misleading.

Directly asking customers for solutions yields generic answers your competitors also hear. The goal is to uncover their underlying problems, which is your job to solve, not theirs to articulate. This approach leads to unique insights and avoids creating 'me-too' products.

Instead of starting with available data, marketers should first identify and rank key business decisions by their potential financial impact. This decision-first approach ensures data collection and analysis efforts are focused on what truly drives business value, preventing 'analysis paralysis' and resource waste.

A research project intended for content can reveal that your target audience doesn't actually perceive the problem your product solves. This finding can force a fundamental pivot in your entire go-to-market strategy, including messaging and target customer profile, making it more than just a marketing asset.

Executives often see "discovery" as a slow, academic exercise. To overcome this, reframe the process as "derisking" the initiative. By referencing past projects that failed due to unvetted assumptions, you can position research not as a delay, but as a crucial step to prevent costly mistakes.