To move beyond platitudes about collaboration, one 5x CEO had his executive team stack-rank one another on their effectiveness as team players. This process created a measurable, accountable system that surfaced hidden friction and spotlighted true team-first leaders.

Related Insights

Teams often mistake compromise for collaboration, leading to average outcomes. True collaboration requires balancing high assertiveness (people speaking their mind directly) with high cooperativeness (openly listening to others). It is not about meeting in the middle.

Building a culture where teams hold each other accountable isn't complex. It requires a leader to be a "dictator" in setting clear expectations—literally saying "I want you all to be accountable"—and then being willing to deliver the verdict on consequences when people fail to meet those standards. The problem is often leader avoidance, not team inability.

Focusing on individual performance metrics can be counterproductive. As seen in the "super chicken" experiment, top individual performers often succeed by suppressing others. This lowers team collaboration and harms long-term group output, which can be up to 160% more productive than a group of siloed high-achievers.

To drive data discipline, a RevOps leader should consistently review a core set of metrics with the executive team. This forces their own team to come prepared with answers. This scrutiny trickles down, as sales leaders learn which metrics matter and begin proactively reviewing them with their own business partners.

To solve misalignment, the company cascaded OKRs from the CEO down. Critically, regional leaders were made 'champions' of key pillars like user acquisition. This gave them ownership and a direct voice in shaping product solutions, turning potentially adversarial relationships into collaborative partnerships.

To break down silos and encourage a platform mindset, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella changed performance reviews. Every employee had to document how they contributed to the success of others, directly linking collaboration to their compensation. This made the cultural shift tangible and non-negotiable, moving beyond mere talk.

To break down silos, leaders should encourage teams to "move as a group." This means using shared, informal communication channels like group texts to brainstorm and tackle challenges collectively in real-time, rather than having individual members work in isolation.

A top-performing CEO adapted the board practice of an "executive session." He periodically removes himself from his own leadership meetings and asks an HR leader to gather candid feedback on his performance. This powerfully models vulnerability and a commitment to continuous improvement for the entire organization.

Solely measuring a team's output fails to capture the health of their collaboration. A more robust assessment includes tracking goal achievement, team psychological safety, role clarity, and the speed of execution. This provides a holistic view of team effectiveness.

An effective leadership assessment measures two distinct axes: the team's alignment on the *importance* of a strategic goal and their agreement on how well it's being *executed*. This dual focus pinpoints misalignment on priorities, not just execution gaps.