Before selling two-thirds of his company Gym Launch for $31M, Alex Hormozi had already taken $42M in distributions. This proves that for highly profitable businesses, the wealth generated from ongoing operations can be far more significant than the headline exit price, flipping the script on the importance of the final sale.
Related Insights
Two businesses with identical revenue and profit can have vastly different valuations. A company that runs independently is a valuable, sellable asset with a high multiple. One that requires the owner's constant involvement is just a high-stress job, with wealth accumulating only through taxed personal income.
Hormozi's first million outside his gyms came from a 'free' offer where he paid for marketing and worked for free, keeping only the initial cash from new customers he acquired for gym owners. This demonstrates that 'free' can be a highly profitable acquisition model, not just a loss leader.
While 8% of founders pay themselves nothing to maximize reinvestment for a future exit, this strategy is often regretted. Even among founders who achieved a multi-million dollar exit, many later wished they had paid themselves at least a small salary to improve their quality of life during the building phase.
An exit that provides a significant financial win but isn't enough to retire on can be a powerful motivator. It acts as a 'proof point' that validates the founder's ability while leaving them hungry for a much larger outcome, making them more driven than founders who are either pre-success or have achieved a life-changing exit.
A $33M exit sounds huge, but Scott Galloway only took home $2-3M. This was because he owned just 20-30% of the company and had to split proceeds with his ex-wife. It's a powerful reminder that founder equity and personal circumstances, not the sale price, determine the actual take-home amount.
A profitable business that requires the founder's constant involvement is just a high-paying job, not a valuable asset. Enterprise value, which makes a business sellable, is only created when systems and employees can generate profit independently of the founder's direct labor.
Exiting a cash-flowing business swaps a continuous income stream for a finite pot of money. This psychological shift can create deep financial insecurity as founders must now protect capital rather than generate it, even if they are objectively wealthy.
For indefinite-hold companies, executive wealth is created through a stream of cash, not a future sale. Management earns equity over time in unlevered businesses, allowing them to receive meaningful cash distributions. This aligns incentives for long-term, sustainable profit growth rather than a quick flip.
After discovering that buyers of their portfolio companies were achieving 3x returns, TA shifted its strategy. Instead of selling 100%, they now often sell partial stakes. This provides liquidity to LPs and de-risks the investment while allowing TA to capture significant upside from the company's continued compounding growth.
Marshall Haas sold a controlling stake in his company but retained significant equity. His goal was not just a cash payout, but to create a structure that provided ongoing cash flow, a continued advisory role, and a way to avoid the boredom and financial anxiety that often follows a complete, all-or-nothing exit.