Benchmarking against direct competitors is useless if the entire sector lags in partnership maturity. To truly improve, measure your program against best-in-class companies in adjacent or even unrelated domains to set a higher, more aspirational standard for success.

Related Insights

Instead of copying what top competitors do well, analyze what they do poorly or neglect. Excelling in those specific areas creates a powerful differentiator. This is how Eleven Madison Park focused on rivals' bad coffee service to become the world's #1 restaurant.

Shift partner tiering away from being solely based on sales volume. Instead, use a partner's investment in training and certification as the main parameter. This approach rewards commitment and capability, which are leading indicators of future success. It allows smaller, highly-invested partners to be recognized and supported appropriately.

Traditional revenue tiers (Gold, Silver, Bronze) are vendor-centric. A more effective approach is to classify partners by their business model. For example, an MSSP needs predictable upfront costs to build a service, while a value-added reseller may prefer volume-based rebates. Tailoring your program to their model, not just their size, is key.

Instead of matching rivals' strengths, identify their weaknesses or overlooked details, like a poor coffee program. Focusing on these neglected areas allows you to create a unique, best-in-class experience and gain a competitive foothold. Guidara's team calls this 'reverse benchmarking.'

Beyond not competing with partners, genuine trust is built by preventing "extreme favoritism to the bigger partner." Partners watch to see if you provide a level playing field for everyone, regardless of size. Trust is also solidified by how you act when things go wrong; a vendor that "shows up" during a crisis builds loyalty.

In the public sector, the goal is not to outcompete rivals but to improve service delivery. A government CPO's version of competitive research involves talking to counterparts in other states, partnering with civic tech organizations, and learning from innovative vendors to understand best practices.

“Partner Lifetime Value” reframes partnerships as long-term assets, not transactional wins. Companies committing to consistent, long-run partnerships achieve superior growth and profitability, creating a force multiplier effect far beyond standard customer lifetime value.

Founders can get objective performance feedback without waiting for a fundraising cycle. AI benchmarking tools can analyze routine documents like monthly investor updates or board packs, providing continuous, low-effort insight into how the company truly stacks up against the market.

A true diagnostic for product maturity requires a 360-degree view. By surveying product leaders, their teams, cross-functional partners (like sales and engineering), and senior leadership, you can uncover critical perception gaps about your team's effectiveness.

Instead of letting a partner program evolve organically, start with a clear vision of the ideal channel based on board-level metrics. Actively build towards that future state, which includes strategically stopping activities that only service a legacy model.