When different departments push their own projects onto the sales team, reps get overloaded. To solve this, enablement leaders must shift the focus of every initiative away from departmental priorities and toward a shared customer outcome. This unified goal minimizes internal friction and clarifies what's truly important.

The fundamental tension between sales and marketing extends beyond KPIs to their core operational perspectives. Marketing operates at a macro level, analyzing broad market trends and brand awareness. In contrast, sales is hyper-focused on the micro level of one-on-one customer interactions. This inherent difference in viewpoint is a primary source of friction.

Engineering often defaults to a 'project mindset,' focusing on churning out features and measuring velocity. True alignment with product requires a 'product mindset,' which prioritizes understanding the customer and tracking the value being delivered, not just the output.

The disconnect where executives prioritize retention and directors focus on acquisition is a symptom of misaligned pressures. To resolve this, leadership must establish unified metrics that hold teams accountable for both short-term acquisition and long-term customer value, bridging the gap.

Misalignment stems from sales and marketing using different numbers and narratives. High-performing organizations treat GTM as a single, unified motion. They focus on seamlessly passing the customer from one stage to the next, prioritizing a collective win over defending individual functional metrics.

To get buy-in for developer experience initiatives, don't use generic metrics. First, identify leadership's primary concerns—be it market share, profit margin, or velocity. Then, frame your measurements and impact using that specific language to ensure your work resonates.

Leaders often assume goal alignment. A simple exercise is to ask each team member to articulate the project's goal in their own words. The resulting variety in answers immediately highlights where alignment is needed before work begins, preventing wasted effort on divergent paths.

Gaining genuine team alignment is more complex than getting a superficial agreement. It involves actively surfacing unspoken assumptions and hidden contexts to ensure that when the team agrees, they are all agreeing to the same, fully understood plan.

There are few universally ideal values beyond basic table stakes like integrity. The effectiveness of a value is highly context-dependent. For example, a value of slow, careful consensus-building is critical in a nuclear facility but would cripple a fast-moving ad agency that requires decisiveness.