A modern strategy for localized MSI-high gastroesophageal cancer is to begin with dual immune checkpoint blockade. Clinicians can then perform an early response assessment and pivot to chemoimmunotherapy if the initial response is suboptimal, allowing for a flexible, response-adapted approach.

Experts favor a Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (NIVO+EP) combination for newly diagnosed, MSI-high, stage IV gastroesophageal cancer patients who can tolerate it. This approach avoids chemotherapy and yields high, sustained response rates, including potential for complete pathologic responses in metastatic settings.

While neoadjuvant-only immunotherapy has a strong rationale, a patient-level cross-trial comparison of CheckMate 816 (neoadjuvant) and 770T (perioperative) suggests the addition of adjuvant therapy improves event-free survival, favoring a full perioperative approach.

The Matterhorn study found that adding the immunotherapy drug Durvalumab to FLOT chemotherapy significantly improved survival in localized gastric cancer. Surprisingly, this benefit extended to patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression, challenging the biomarker's predictive value for immunotherapy efficacy in this perioperative setting.

For fit patients with technically stage IV gastroesophageal cancer but limited disease (e.g., only non-regional lymph nodes), a curative-intent approach is viable. This involves initial systemic biomarker-driven therapy, followed by multidisciplinary reassessment and potential consolidation with radiation or surgery on any residual disease sites.

New targeted therapies are often approved only for first-line use. This forces clinicians into a difficult choice: using one effective drug like a checkpoint inhibitor means forfeiting the chance to use another, like zolbetuximab, in a subsequent line of treatment, thereby losing a valuable therapeutic option.

Despite a study showing a minor hazard ratio benefit for a FLOT-like regimen over FOLFOX in the metastatic setting, experts advise against it. The significant increase in toxicity outweighs the small efficacy advantage, especially in symptomatic metastatic patients who are often nutritionally deficient and less able to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy.

Despite being the backbone for new combination therapies in trials like Matterhorn, the FLOT chemotherapy regimen has significant toxicity. Approximately 30% of patients discontinue treatment due to adverse events, and only half manage to complete the post-surgery adjuvant portion, posing a major clinical challenge in real-world settings.

Clinicians advise against continuing targeted agents like zolbituximab or trastuzumab after disease progression in gastroesophageal cancer. The biological heterogeneity of this cancer type means that if a targeted therapy isn't working, it's unlikely to provide benefit with a different chemotherapy backbone.