Anthropic's ads are effective because they tap into the common consumer experience of feeling spied on by platforms like Meta. By transposing this established fear of "creepy" ad targeting onto the new territory of LLMs, the campaign makes its speculative warnings feel more plausible and emotionally resonant.
Related Insights
Sam Altman states that OpenAI's first principle for advertising is to avoid putting ads directly into the LLM's conversational stream. He calls the scenario depicted in Anthropic's ads a 'crazy dystopic, bad sci-fi movie,' suggesting ads will be adjacent to the user experience, not manipulative content within it.
Dario Amadei's public criticism of advertising and "social media entrepreneurs" isn't just personal ideology. It's a strategic narrative to position Anthropic as the principled, enterprise-focused AI choice, contrasting with consumer-focused rivals like Google and OpenAI who need to "maximize engagement for a billion users."
The conflict between AI labs has moved beyond a 'cold war' of poaching talent to a public battle for perception. Anthropic’s ads represent a 'gloves off' moment, using what the hosts call 'fear-mongering' and 'propaganda' to directly attack a competitor's business model on a massive stage like the Super Bowl.
Anthropic's ads lack a call-to-action, indicating their primary goal isn't consumer downloads. Instead, they use fear-mongering to "muddy the water" around OpenAI's upcoming ad product, aiming to make enterprise decision-makers and regulators wary of ad-supported AI models before they launch.
Observing a competitor's dystopian ad campaign, Dan Siroker realized the worst outcome for a startup isn't bad publicity, but irrelevance. Controversial marketing, even if it gets negative reactions, can generate crucial mindshare and get people talking, which is a prerequisite for user adoption.
By framing its competitor's potential ads as a "betrayal," Anthropic's Super Bowl campaign reinforced the public's negative perception of AI as another manipulative tech scheme. This damaged the industry's overall reputation in a country already highly skeptical of the technology, turning the attack into friendly fire.
The Super Bowl campaign is not just about user acquisition. It's a strategic move to build brand awareness with investors, boost morale to retain elite researchers, increase public scrutiny on OpenAI's ad rollout, and put themselves on the map ahead of a potential IPO.
Anthropic's campaign risks poisoning the well for all consumer AI assistants by stoking fear about ad integration. This high-risk strategy accepts potential damage to its own brand and the category in order to inflict greater harm on the market leader, OpenAI.
Modern advertising weaponizes fear to generate sales. By creating or amplifying insecurities about health, social status, or safety, companies manufacture a problem that their product can conveniently solve, contributing to a baseline level of societal anxiety for commercial gain.
Anthropic's ads imply OpenAI's upcoming ad integration will compromise AI responses with biased, low-quality suggestions. This is a "dirty" but effective tactic, creating fear and doubt about a competitor's product by attacking the category leader without naming them.