Create distinct AI agents representing key executives (e.g., CEO, CMO, CSO). By posing strategic questions to each, you can simulate how different departments might react, identify potential misalignments in priorities, and refine proposals before presenting them to real stakeholders.

Instead of relying on a single AI, use different models (e.g., ChatGPT for internal context, Claude for an objective view) for the same problem. This multi-model approach generates diverse perspectives and higher-quality strategic outputs.

AI expert Andrej Karpathy suggests treating LLMs as simulators, not entities. Instead of asking, "What do you think?", ask, "What would a group of [relevant experts] say?". This elicits a wider range of simulated perspectives and avoids the biases inherent in forcing the LLM to adopt a single, artificial persona.

A UK startup has found that LLMs can generate accurate, simulated focus group discussions. By creating diverse digital personas, the AI reproduces the nuanced and often surprising feedback that typically requires expensive and slow in-person research, especially in politics.

Instead of accepting a single answer, prompt the AI to generate multiple options and then argue the pros and cons of each. This "debating partner" technique forces the model to stress-test its own logic, leading to more robust and nuanced outputs for strategic decision-making.

Instead of asking AI for a final answer, use it as a sophisticated focus group. Prompt it to embody different customer personas (e.g., "a left-leaning feminist," "a conservative male") and provide feedback on your messaging from those perspectives. This helps refine copy before market testing.

Move beyond simple prompts by designing detailed interactions with specific AI personas, like a "critic" or a "big thinker." This allows teams to debate concepts back and forth, transforming AI from a task automator into a true thought partner that amplifies rigor.

Leverage AI to gain external perspectives without meetings. Prompt it to act as a specific persona—like a skeptical CEO, an enthusiastic user, or a New York Times reviewer—to critique your work. This reveals blind spots and strengthens your idea before sharing it.

Define different agents (e.g., Designer, Engineer, Executive) with unique instructions and perspectives, then task them with reviewing a document in parallel. This generates diverse, structured feedback that mimics a real-world team review, surfacing potential issues from multiple viewpoints simultaneously.