The Department of War is threatening to blacklist Anthropic for prohibiting military use of its AI, a severe penalty typically reserved for foreign adversaries like Huawei. This conflict represents a proxy war over who dictates the terms of AI use: the technology creators or the government.
Unlike responsive US AI companies, Chinese firms like ByteDance are ignoring copyright concerns with models like SeedDance 2.0. This has forced Hollywood institutions to shift strategy from legal challenges to public pressure campaigns in an attempt to protect their intellectual property.
Skeptics argue the AI-driven productivity boom theory is based on thin evidence. The downward job revisions fueling the theory were concentrated in government, mining, and manufacturing—not the white-collar sectors supposedly most impacted by AI, suggesting other economic factors are at play.
Data shows just 1.6 job openings per 100 employees in professional and business services—the lowest in over a decade and below pandemic levels. This severe weakness, with a hiring rate matching the 2008 financial crisis, suggests a deep, accelerating downturn for white-collar roles.
Stanford economist Erik Brynjolfsson argues that a major downward revision of 2025 job numbers, while GDP figures remained strong, mathematically implies a massive productivity surge. This suggests AI's economic impact is finally visible in macroeconomic data, moving beyond anecdote and theory.
General-purpose technologies like AI initially suppress measured productivity as firms make unmeasured investments in new workflows and skills. Economist Erik Brynjolfsson argues recent data suggests we are past the trough of this "J-curve" and entering the "harvest phase" where productivity gains accelerate.