Contrary to signaling fiscal weakness, U.S. government shutdowns historically cause Treasury yields to fall. The increased political and economic uncertainty drives a flight-to-safety trade, where investors buy Treasuries as a haven, benefiting the very market tied to the government in turmoil.

Fears of a US-Iran conflict disrupting oil flows are overstated. Any potential US military action would likely be designed to be 'surgical' to specifically avoid Iran's oil infrastructure, as the administration's priority is preventing economic shocks and energy price hikes ahead of elections.

Despite rising oil prices, there's no evidence of a supply shortage. Physical market indicators have even softened. The rally is fueled by investors buying "insurance" against potential geopolitical disruptions, creating a risk premium that doesn't reflect the market's weak underlying fundamentals.

If the conflict leads to persistently high oil prices and sticky inflation, bonds may fail to act as a safe-haven asset. Both stock and bond prices could fall in tandem, undermining traditional balanced portfolio strategies.

The knee-jerk reaction to a geopolitical shock is often a bond market rally (flight to safety). However, if the shock impacts supply (e.g., oil), the market can quickly reverse. It pivots from pricing geopolitical risk to pricing the risk of persistent inflation, forcing yields higher in anticipation of rate hikes.

The market is pricing a significantly larger risk premium into Brent crude oil compared to natural gas. Analysts believe potential disruptions from U.S.-Iran talks would primarily impact Iranian oil exports, rather than cause wider disruptions to LNG flows through the Strait of Hormuz, which would affect gas prices.

While short-term oil contracts react to immediate geopolitical stress, a sustained rise in longer-dated prices above $80-$85 indicates the market believes the disruption is persistent, signaling a more severe, long-term economic impact.

Despite heightened U.S.-Iran tensions, oil prices show only a minor risk premium (~$2). The market believes an oversupplied global market, coupled with a U.S. preference for surgical strikes that avoid energy infrastructure, will prevent a major supply disruption.

U.S.-China friction presents a dual threat to bond markets. Near-term growth risks from tariffs and domestic instability could push yields lower. Simultaneously, medium-term uncertainties from higher fiscal deficits, inflation, and AI-related spending point towards a steeper yield curve and higher long-term rates.