U.S.-China friction presents a dual threat to bond markets. Near-term growth risks from tariffs and domestic instability could push yields lower. Simultaneously, medium-term uncertainties from higher fiscal deficits, inflation, and AI-related spending point towards a steeper yield curve and higher long-term rates.
Related Insights
The US is not facing a single issue but a convergence of multiple stressors. Unsustainable fiscal policy, fragile funding markets, geopolitical shifts, energy production issues, and leveraged financial players create a highly volatile environment where one failure could trigger a cascade.
The inflation market's reaction to tariff news has fundamentally shifted. Unlike in the past, recent tariff threats failed to raise front-end inflation expectations. This indicates investors are now more concerned about the negative impact on economic growth and labor markets than the direct pass-through to consumer prices.
Uncertainty around the 2026 Fed Chair nomination is influencing markets now. The perceived higher likelihood of dovish candidates keeps long-term policy expectations soft, putting upward pressure on the yield curve's slope independent of immediate economic data.
While markets fixate on Fed rate decisions, the primary driver of liquidity and high equity valuations is geopolitical risk influencing international trade and capital flows. This macro force is more significant than domestic monetary policy and explains market resilience despite higher rates.
A high-conviction view for 2026 is a material steepening of the U.S. Treasury yield curve. This shift will not be driven by long-term rates, but by the two-year yield falling as markets more accurately price in future Federal Reserve rate cuts.
The Fed is prioritizing its labor market mandate over its inflation target. This "asymmetrically dovish" policy is expected to lead to stronger growth and higher inflation, biasing inflation expectations and long-end yields upward, causing the yield curve to steepen.
A new market dynamic has emerged where Fed rate cuts cause long-term bond yields to rise, breaking historical patterns. This anomaly is driven by investor concerns over fiscal imbalances and high national debt, meaning monetary easing no longer has its traditional effect on the back end of the yield curve.
The global shift away from centralized manufacturing (deglobalization) requires redundant investment in infrastructure like semiconductor fabs in multiple countries. Simultaneously, the AI revolution demands enormous capital for data centers and chips. This dual surge in investment demand is a powerful structural force pushing the neutral rate of interest higher.
A simple framework explains the structural shift to higher interest rates. Retiring Boomers spend savings (Demographics), governments borrow more (Debt), global capital flows fracture (Deglobalization), AI requires huge investment (Data Centers), and geopolitical tensions increase military spending (Defense). These factors collectively increase borrowing costs.
Despite fears of fiscal dominance driving yields up, US bond yields have remained controlled. This suggests a "financial repression" scenario is winning, where the Treasury and Federal Reserve coordinate, perhaps through careful auction management, to keep borrowing costs contained and suppress long-term rates.