Get your free personalized podcast brief
We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
A candidate's inability to take responsibility for a scandal is often more damaging than the transgression itself. Attacking the press and denying verifiable facts keeps the negative story alive. The superior crisis communications strategy is to acknowledge the mistake and quickly pivot the narrative.
Related Insights
When you make an error, immediately admit it, take full responsibility, and present solutions. This level of candor often builds more trust and long-term business than if the error had never happened.
In the old media world, the response to a gaffe was damage control and avoidance. In today's direct, high-volume media environment, the strategy has flipped. Horowitz states the answer to a mistake is not to apologize or retreat but to 'flood the zone' with a continuous stream of new content, quickly moving the conversation forward.
In analyzing a public scandal, Scott Galloway notes that the greatest damage in a crisis typically isn't the initial event but the subsequent "shrapnel": the attempts to cover up, excuse, or avoid accountability. An effective response requires acknowledging the problem, taking responsibility, and overcorrecting.
A superior crisis response playbook goes beyond acknowledging a mistake and taking responsibility. To truly rebuild trust, leaders should overcorrect with a positive action that is disproportionately forceful compared to the initial error, demonstrating a profound commitment to the values that were compromised.
The common instinct in a brand crisis is to repeatedly apologize. However, after acknowledging the mistake and the fix, the best path is to stop talking about it. Loyal customers want the brand to return to being trustworthy, and over-apologizing keeps the focus on the failure.
Public figures who apologize for transgressions are often perceived as 'wounded prey,' triggering more attacks rather than redemption. This dynamic makes admitting fault a confession of weakness, incentivizing politicians to instead ignore or deny wrongdoing to maintain power, as seen with Al Franken's resignation.
When the Trump administration mistakenly struck an Iranian school, its denial and false claims compounded the tragedy. The correct crisis response is to immediately acknowledge the error, take full responsibility, and outline corrective actions, rather than appearing both incompetent and dishonest.
When facing intense public scrutiny, leaders must appear calm and measured, even if panicking internally. Afterwards, it is crucial to clarify your position quickly and concisely. This allows you to control the narrative and avoid creating a new, negative news cycle.
When faced with sustained political attacks and threats, a media organization may strategically shift from cautious appeasement to aggressive, adversarial journalism. This pivot reflects a calculation that defending journalistic integrity is a better brand and survival strategy than attempting to placate a hostile political actor.
When a branding mistake occurs, like a scandal or bad press, the strategy is not to deny or hide it. Instead, you should overwhelm the negative association by creating a high volume of new, positive pairings and experiences for your audience until the original mistake becomes irrelevant.
