In 2013, long before the Ukraine invasion, Putin publicly railed against U.S. shale gas. He presciently saw that it would eventually be exported as LNG, undermining the influence of Russia's state-owned Gazprom and eroding his energy leverage over Europe, a fear that has since been realized.

Related Insights

With over half of new global LNG supply coming from the US, an impending oversupply will force US export facilities to operate at significantly lower utilization rates. This transforms the US from a simple high-growth exporter into a flexible, market-balancing swing producer, a role it was not designed for.

Driven by U.S. shale, Brazilian and Guyanese oil, and Canadian pipelines, the Western Hemisphere's importance in global fossil fuel production has surged to levels not seen in nearly a century. This geographic shift fundamentally alters global energy dependencies and geopolitical focus.

China's renewed commitment to the previously stalled Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline is a direct geopolitical response to the U.S. using trade and energy as weapons. This move signals a strategic pivot to reduce its energy dependency on the Western Hemisphere amid escalating trade tensions.

Putin's history shows a reliable pattern: he appears cooperative and makes agreements, only to later act in his own self-interest. To predict his moves in conflicts like the Ukraine war, one must analyze this long-term behavioral pattern rather than his current statements or gestures.

Recognizing Russia's high tolerance for military casualties, Ukraine has shifted its strategy to asymmetric economic warfare. By systematically using long-range drones to attack Russian oil refineries and tankers, Ukraine aims to inflict financial pain where the human cost of war has failed to be a deterrent, creating what they call "the real sanctions."

In Russia, nominally private companies like Gazprom function as direct extensions of the state. Their international investments are designed not just for profit but to achieve geopolitical goals, creating a system where foreign policy, business interests, and the personal wealth of the ruling class are completely inseparable.

The rise of destination-flexible U.S. LNG is fundamentally altering global gas markets. By acting as the marginal supplier and an effective 'global storage hub,' the U.S. reduces Europe's strategic need for high storage levels, leading to structurally lower prices and a new market equilibrium.

Massive expansion of Russian pipeline capacity, including the Power of Siberia 2, will increase gas flows to China from 38 BCM in 2025 to 106 BCM by 2035. This dramatic increase in secure overland supply is the primary reason why China's demand for seaborne LNG is forecast to peak and then plateau around 2032.

The staggering rise of U.S. shale production disrupted the global oil market, fundamentally altering its power structure. This disruption directly pushed rivals Russia and Saudi Arabia to form the OPEC+ alliance in 2016 to collectively manage supply and counter American influence.

The global energy transition is also a geopolitical race. China is strategically positioning itself to dominate 21st-century technologies like solar and EVs. In contrast, the U.S. is hampered by a legacy mindset that equates economic growth with fossil fuels, risking its future competitiveness.