Traditional SaaS switching costs were based on painful data migrations, which LLMs may now automate. The new moat for AI companies is creating deep, customized integrations into a customer's unique operational workflows. This is achieved through long, hands-on pilot periods that make the AI solution indispensable and hard to replace.

Ubiquitous local AI agents that can script any service and reverse-engineer APIs fundamentally threaten the SaaS recurring revenue model. If software lock-in becomes impossible, business models may shift back to selling expensive, open hardware as a one-time asset, a return to the "shrink wrap" era.

While AI expands software's capabilities, vendors may not capture the value. Companies could use AI to build solutions in-house more cheaply. Furthermore, traditional "per-seat" pricing models are undermined when AI reduces the number of employees required, potentially shrinking revenue even as the software delivers more value.

For decades, buying generalized SaaS was more efficient than building custom software. AI coding agents reverse this. Now, companies can build hyper-specific, more effective tools internally for less cost than a bloated SaaS subscription, because they only need to solve their unique problem.

The primary threat of Large Language Models to the SaaS industry isn't that they will build better software, but that they will enable the creation of 50 to 100 competitors for every existing player. This massive increase in competition will inevitably compress profit margins for everyone.

AI doesn't kill all software; it bifurcates the market. Companies with strong moats like distribution, proprietary data, and enterprise lock-in will thrive by integrating AI. However, companies whose only advantage was their software code will be wiped out as AI makes the code itself a commodity. The moat is no longer the software.

The cloud era created a fragmented landscape of single-purpose SaaS tools, leading to enterprise fatigue. AI enables unified platforms to perform these specialized tasks, creating a massive consolidation wave and disrupting the niche application market.

The lucrative maintenance and migration revenue streams for enterprise SaaS, which constitute up to 90% of software dollars, are under threat. AI agents and new systems are poised to aggressively shrink this market, severely impacting public SaaS companies' incremental revenue.

Unlike traditional SaaS where high switching costs prevent price wars, the AI market faces a unique threat. The portability of prompts and reliance on interchangeable models could enable rapid commoditization. A price war could be "terrifying" and "brutal" for the entire ecosystem, posing a significant downside risk.