While tech giants could technically replicate Perplexity, their core business models—advertising for Google, e-commerce for Amazon—create a fundamental conflict of interest. An independent player can align purely with the user's best interests, creating a strategic opening that incumbents are structurally unable to fill without cannibalizing their primary revenue streams.

When dealing with tech giants like Google or OpenAI, publishers should not rely on goodwill. They are self-interested capitalists who prioritize their own profits. The only reliable strategy is to build mutually beneficial economic ecosystems or create direct relationships with your audience.

Investments in OpenAI from giants like Amazon and Microsoft are strategic moves to embed the AI leader within their ecosystems. This is evidenced by deals requiring OpenAI to use the investors' proprietary processors and cloud infrastructure, securing technological dependency.

Google has caught up in AI technology, but its biggest hurdle is strategic. Integrating generative AI threatens its core search advertising model, which accounts for 80% of revenue. This creates an innovator's dilemma where they must carefully disrupt themselves without destroying their cash cow.

Content creators are in an impossible position. They can block Google's crawlers and lose their primary traffic source, effectively committing "business suicide." Alternatively, they can allow access, thereby providing the content that fuels the very AI systems undermining their business model.

An analyst categorizes large tech companies into AI "laggards, tweeners, and darlings." Tweeners, like Amazon and Meta, are in a precarious catch-up position. Unlike darlings, they must make significant investments and organizational shifts to improve their AI models and monetization, signaling a period of higher spending and strategic refocusing.

Rivals like Microsoft and Amazon are investing in each other's primary AI partners (e.g., Amazon in OpenAI). This isn't random; it reflects a strategic alignment to create a powerful counterweight against Google, which they view as the single biggest long-term threat in the AI race.

The "AI-generated" label carries a negative connotation of being cheap, efficient, and lacking human creativity. This perception devalues the final product in the eyes of consumers and creators, disincentivizing platforms from implementing labels that would anger their user base and advertisers.

The current debate focuses on labeling AI-generated content. However, as AI content floods the internet and becomes the default, the more efficient system will be to label the smaller, scarcer category: authentic, human-created content.