The current debate focuses on labeling AI-generated content. However, as AI content floods the internet and becomes the default, the more efficient system will be to label the smaller, scarcer category: authentic, human-created content.
Related Insights
In the age of AI, the new standard for value is the "GPT Test." If a person's public statements, writing, or ideas could have been generated by a large language model, they will fail to stand out. This places an immense premium on true originality, deep insight, and an authentic voice—the very things AI struggles to replicate.
In an era of AI-generated articles and fake social media personas, Reddit's anonymous, human-driven communities offer a rare source of authenticity. This "realness" is valuable to users seeking genuine connection and to AI companies needing high-quality human data for training their models.
As AI drives the cost of content creation to zero, the world floods with 'average' material. In this environment, the most valuable and scarce skill becomes 'taste'—the ability to identify, curate, and champion high-quality, commercially viable work. This elevates the role of human curators over pure creators.
![Ari Emanuel - The Anti-AI Bet - [Invest Like the Best, EP.448] thumbnail](https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c5910280-c4dd-11f0-94be-ab6a7a5865b0/image/1e5a2263eb62fcde200846919e24419a.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&max-w=3000&max-h=3000&fit=crop&auto=format,compress)
As AI-generated 'slop' floods platforms and reduces their utility, a counter-movement is brewing. This creates a market opportunity for new social apps that can guarantee human-created and verified content, appealing to users fatigued by endless AI.
Politician Alex Boris argues that expecting humans to spot increasingly sophisticated deepfakes is a losing battle. The real solution is a universal metadata standard (like C2PA) that cryptographically proves if content is real or AI-generated, making unverified content inherently suspect, much like an unsecure HTTP website today.
The definition of "AI slop" is evolving from obviously fake images to a flood of perfectly polished, generic, and boring content. As AI makes flattering imagery cheap to produce, authentic, unpolished, and even unflattering content becomes more valuable for creators trying to stand out on platforms like Instagram.
The debate over using AI avatars, like Databox CEO Peter Caputa's, isn't just about authenticity. It's forcing creators and brands to decide where human connection adds tangible value. As AI-generated content becomes commoditized, authentic human delivery will be positioned as a premium, high-value feature, creating a new market segmentation.
Platforms with real human-generated content have a dual revenue opportunity in the AI era. They can serve ads to their human user base while also selling high-value data licenses to companies like Google that need authentic, up-to-date information to train their large language models.
As AI-generated content becomes ubiquitous, a counter-movement will establish "100% human-generated" as a premium, luxury status symbol. This "artisanal anti-AI" trend will manifest as certifications and exclusive networks, appealing to consumers who value authenticity and human craftsmanship.
Scott Belsky predicts that as AI-generated content floods feeds, audiences will develop a 'membrane of doubt.' To counter this, brands and artists will use 'proof of craft'—behind-the-scenes content showing the human effort involved—as a powerful tool for advertising and building trust.
