People struggle with AI prompts because the model lacks background on their goals and progress. The solution is 'Context Engineering': creating an environment where the AI continuously accumulates user-specific information, materials, and intent, reducing the need for constant prompt tweaking.

Before delegating a complex task, use a simple prompt to have a context-aware system generate a more detailed and effective prompt. This "prompt-for-a-prompt" workflow adds necessary detail and structure, significantly improving the agent's success rate and saving rework.

Instead of spending time trying to craft the perfect prompt from scratch, provide a basic one and then ask the AI a simple follow-up: "What do you need from me to improve this prompt?" The AI will then list the specific context and details it requires, turning prompt engineering into a simple Q&A session.

An effective mental model for prompt engineering is to imagine writing an email to a smart junior analyst working overnight. You must provide the task, the context behind it, desired output format, and specific guidelines, assuming they have intelligence but no background on your thinking.

To get the best results from AI, treat it like a virtual assistant you can have a dialogue with. Instead of focusing on the perfect single prompt, provide rich context about your goals and then engage in a back-and-forth conversation. This collaborative approach yields more nuanced and useful outputs.

To get consistent results from AI, use the "3 C's" framework: Clarity (the AI's role and your goal), Context (the bigger business picture), and Cues (supporting documents like brand guides). Most users fail by not providing enough cues.

For large tasks like creating a business plan, act as a project conductor. First, prompt the AI for individual components like a table of contents or specific sections. Once all parts are generated, use a final prompt to synthesize them into a coherent whole.

Achieve higher-quality results by using an AI to first generate an outline or plan. Then, refine that plan with follow-up prompts before asking for the final execution. This course-corrects early and avoids wasted time on flawed one-shot outputs, ultimately saving time.

Long conversations degrade LLM performance as attention gets clogged with irrelevant details. An expert workflow is to stop, ask the model to summarize the key points of the discussion, and then start a fresh chat with that summary as the initial prompt. This keeps the context clean and the model on track.