At the $100M ARR mark, complexity rises. "Slowing down" means intentionally focusing on quality and planning to prevent rework and tech debt. This allows teams to ship faster in the long run, like taking a shorter, well-planned hiking trail instead of running a longer one.
Related Insights
As startups hire and add structure, they create a natural pull towards slower, more organized processes—a 'slowness gravity'. This is the default state. Founders must consciously and continuously fight this tendency to maintain the high-velocity iteration that led to their initial success.
As articulated by Eric Ries in 'The Lean Startup,' raw speed of shipping is meaningless if you're building in the wrong direction. The true measure of progress is how quickly a team can validate assumptions and learn what customers want, which prevents costly rework.
Pendo's CPO warns that scaling isn't just about replicating processes for more teams. Leaders must simultaneously build coordination systems (design reviews, clear communication) while fighting to maintain the "maniacal focus on the customer" and rapid innovation that characterize small teams.
Wiz's product team, trained at Microsoft, avoids building features that only solve for today's customer but break with tomorrow's enterprise giant. This 'infinite scale' mindset isn't about slowing down; it's about making conscious architectural choices that prevent time-consuming and costly refactoring later on.
The conventional wisdom that you must sacrifice one of quality, price, or speed is flawed. High-performance teams reject this trade-off, understanding that improving quality is the primary lever. Higher quality reduces rework and defects, which naturally leads to lower long-term costs and faster delivery, creating a virtuous cycle.
Gamma's CEO resists the pressure to scale headcount aggressively, arguing that doubling the team size does not guarantee double the speed. He believes a smaller, more agile team can change direction faster, which is more valuable than raw speed in a rapidly evolving market.
Similar to technical debt, "narrative debt" accrues when teams celebrate speed and output while neglecting shared understanding. This gap registers as momentum, not risk, making the system fragile while metrics still look healthy.
Every change introduces a temporary performance decrease as the team adapts—an 'implementation dip.' This guaranteed loss often outweighs the uncertain potential gain from minor tweaks. Real growth comes from compounding skill through repetition of a working system, not from perpetual optimization.
After passing $500k ARR, OutboundSync's team found its enterprise-grade tech stack created unnecessary friction. Realizing they were an SMB, not a scaled company, they ripped out complex tools for simpler ones, proving that premature scaling of internal systems is a significant operational drag.
The misconception that discovery slows down delivery is dangerous. Like stretching before a race prevents injury, proper, time-boxed discovery prevents building the wrong thing. This avoids costly code rewrites and iterative launches that miss the mark, ultimately speeding up the delivery of a successful product.
