Drawing lessons from former CEO Hank Paulson, David Solomon emphasizes that a leader's most crucial function is to maintain a clear direction—a 'compass pointing north'—and make the right call, even when it is unpopular or goes against the strong consensus of the room.

Related Insights

A core tenet of Forrest Li's leadership is that leaders must personally own and execute the most difficult decisions, like freezing salaries. He argues that pleasant and popular tasks should be delegated, while the leader's ultimate responsibility is to show up in difficult times and make the unpopular-but-necessary calls.

An effective CEO maintains a consistent core philosophy but tailors the emotional and subjective components of the message for different audiences (e.g., engineering, sales, investors). This context-switching ensures everyone can hear and internalize the message in a way that resonates with them personally.

Nicolai Tangen, CEO of the world's largest sovereign wealth fund, redefines the CEO acronym as "Chief Energy Officer." He sees his primary job as providing energy, direction, and inspiration to push the team toward ambitious goals they might initially resist, framing leadership as a function of energy transfer.

Former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger advises that a leader's job is to temper the extremes of market cycles. Instead of being a cheerleader, a CEO must act as a point of reality, ensuring the organization understands that "the high is never as high and the low is never as low."

During a major crisis, a leader cannot rely on team consensus because everyone is still aligned with the old, now-invalid strategy. The CEO must dictate the new direction and be willing to be inconsistent to reset the organization quickly.

When a founder advises a successor to 'make decisions that energize you,' it's a strategic directive, not a wellness tip. It serves as a guardrail against the 'death by a thousand cuts' that comes from compromising core beliefs just to make others comfortable, thereby preserving the vision.

If a decision has universal agreement, a leader isn't adding value because the group would have reached that conclusion anyway. True leadership is demonstrated when you make a difficult, unpopular choice that others would not, guiding the organization through necessary but painful steps.

The most paralyzing decisions for a leader aren't clear-cut choices but dilemmas where every path is painful. Ben Horowitz's decision to take his company public with minimal revenue was a bad idea, but the alternative—bankruptcy—was worse. The key skill is choosing the 'slightly better' path in the abyss, despite the guaranteed negative feedback.

David Solomon rejects the common framing of prioritizing customers, employees, or shareholders. He views leadership as conducting an orchestra, where the goal is to keep all three stakeholder groups in harmony. Neglecting one will inevitably cause the entire performance to suffer.

The pursuit of consensus is a dangerous trap for leaders aiming for standout success. Achieving breakthroughs requires the strength to proceed based on intellectual conviction, even amidst friction and criticism. This means accepting that you cannot please everyone and that some will inevitably disagree with your path.