Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

When your own company operates with a "building the plane as we fly" mentality, intentionally seek an agency with a rigid, structured process for a rebrand. Their structure provides the necessary discipline and guardrails to keep a complex project on track, even if it means you must adapt to their workflow.

Related Insights

A rebrand should be viewed as building the fundamental foundation of a business. Without it, growth attempts are superficial and temporary. With a solid brand, the company has a stable base that can support significant scaling and prevent the business from hitting a growth ceiling.

A key, unspoken role of a marketing agency is to provide political cover for the in-house leader. The agency can act as the "voice of reason," holding the line on unpopular but necessary strategic changes and using their broad industry experience as justification, thus absorbing the internal friction.

Rowell's team initially underestimated their rebrand, thinking it was a simple logo change. They discovered it is a massive, time-consuming operational project, requiring updates to every asset from truck wraps to internal forms. This hidden complexity is often the biggest challenge.

Successful large-scale acquirers remain nimble, flexing their own processes to suit the acquired company rather than force-fitting it into a rigid corporate structure. This preserves the culture and talent that made the company valuable, preventing value destruction and keeping the new team engaged.

The marketing leader should own the initial strategy and vendor selection for a rebrand. Once the visual and verbal identity is locked, a dedicated, detail-oriented project manager should take over execution. This person becomes the central point of contact for all departments, managing tactical details like deck updates and office signage.

Paying an agency just to brainstorm ideas in slide decks is inefficient and disconnected from modern marketing needs. To be effective, agencies must integrate creative ideation with in-house production capabilities to execute at the volume and speed required by digital channels.

To get a CEO fully invested, position the rebrand not as a marketing initiative but as foundational infrastructure that touches every part of the business, from HR and recruiting to sales and customer operations. This reframing elevates its importance and ensures cross-departmental adoption.

Rowell's success stemmed from leaders who committed fully rather than taking a piecemeal approach. Their advice is to avoid doing a rebrand "halfway." Going all-in, despite the fear, prevents a diluted outcome and ensures maximum impact and internal alignment.

The defining characteristic of a great agency relationship isn't just delivering work, but true integration. They should feel like an extension of the internal team—challenging existing ideas, helping the team grow, and working as a complementary partner rather than a transactional vendor.

Keep the rebrand decision-making council intentionally small to maintain momentum. The ideal group combines key leadership (CEO), the project lead (Head of Marketing), an external strategist, and a key internal implementer (Content Manager), deliberately avoiding an all-executive committee to prevent disconnect from execution.