Don't rebrand for the sake of it. A successful rebrand should be a deliberate move to signal a fundamental shift in your business, such as an expansion, a new mission, or a deeper commitment to core values like sustainability. It's an external reflection of an internal change.

For Care.com's rebrand to succeed, it had to be more than a marketing campaign. The brand and product teams collaborated to redesign the user experience and launch new features, ensuring the product itself delivered on the new brand promise of being a trustworthy, less transactional ally.

Ford's CMO credits their rebrand's success to a two-year process of embedding the new strategy across all departments, from HR to product development. This ensured it was more than a marketing campaign by influencing core business operations and decision-making.

Rowell's team initially underestimated their rebrand, thinking it was a simple logo change. They discovered it is a massive, time-consuming operational project, requiring updates to every asset from truck wraps to internal forms. This hidden complexity is often the biggest challenge.

GM's marketing chief advises leaders to balance high-level strategy with deep, hands-on involvement in the daily work. This "hands in the kitchen sink" approach ensures leaders stay grounded and connected to the realities of execution, which is critical for agility during periods of transformation.

To get a CEO fully invested, position the rebrand not as a marketing initiative but as foundational infrastructure that touches every part of the business, from HR and recruiting to sales and customer operations. This reframing elevates its importance and ensures cross-departmental adoption.

When your own company operates with a "building the plane as we fly" mentality, intentionally seek an agency with a rigid, structured process for a rebrand. Their structure provides the necessary discipline and guardrails to keep a complex project on track, even if it means you must adapt to their workflow.

Rowell's success stemmed from leaders who committed fully rather than taking a piecemeal approach. Their advice is to avoid doing a rebrand "halfway." Going all-in, despite the fear, prevents a diluted outcome and ensures maximum impact and internal alignment.

Keep the rebrand decision-making council intentionally small to maintain momentum. The ideal group combines key leadership (CEO), the project lead (Head of Marketing), an external strategist, and a key internal implementer (Content Manager), deliberately avoiding an all-executive committee to prevent disconnect from execution.