Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Consensus earnings for MSCI EM are overly optimistic post-conflict. Historical data from oil supply shocks shows that significant earnings downgrades typically occur with a two to three-quarter delay. This suggests that current perceived market resilience is likely just a temporary lag before revisions catch up to reality.

Related Insights

The oil supply shock isn't simultaneous. It's a rolling disruption dictated by shipping times, hitting Asia first due to its reliance on Gulf crude and shorter voyages (10-20 days). Africa, Europe, and finally the U.S. (35-45 days) feel the impact sequentially, buffered differently by regional inventories.

The market's immediate reaction to the Middle East conflict has been to price in higher inflation due to spiking energy costs. However, it has not yet priced in a significant economic growth shock. This second-order effect, the "shoe that's left to drop," represents a major future risk if the conflict persists.

A significant disconnect exists between asset classes. The oil futures curve prices a prolonged shock, with prices 40% higher by year-end. In contrast, equity and bond markets are largely flat, reflecting a complacent belief in a quick resolution and central bank easing, completely ignoring the underlying supply-demand math.

Re-establishing normal energy flows is not like flipping a switch. It can take months to recover even if a conflict ends quickly. Furthermore, if infrastructure like LNG plants or oil wells is damaged, the supply reduction and economic pain can last for years.

EM local markets have surprisingly not reacted to a nearly 20% surge in oil prices. Analysts believe investors are dismissing the rally as either a temporary geopolitical premium or, more importantly, a consequence of strong global demand. This latter interpretation makes the price increase less concerning for oil-importing nations.

The physical impact of a supply disruption isn't immediate. It takes about two weeks for tankers from the Middle East to reach Asia and over three for Europe. This lag means consumers and industries only start feeling the actual shortage weeks after the event, despite immediate price reactions.

Investors often rush to price in the disinflationary outcome of an oil shock (demand destruction). However, the causal chain is fixed: prices rise first, hitting real spending. Only much later does this weaken the labor market enough to reduce overall inflation, a process that can take 9-12 months to play out.

War-induced oil shocks will create elevated inflation prints that persist for months, even if the conflict resolves today. This data lag handcuffs the Federal Reserve, preventing preemptive rate cuts and creating a minimum six-month pause on supportive action, which puts a ceiling on risk asset valuations.

The global oil supply disruption is not a simultaneous event but a rolling crisis moving from east to west, dictated by shipping times. Asia, heavily reliant on Gulf crude, is already feeling the squeeze, with Africa and Europe next in line, while the U.S. is the most insulated due to longer transit times and domestic production.

Analysis of past energy supply shocks reveals a persistent sell-off in emerging market rates for several months. Conversely, the impact on EM currencies is inconsistent, with the broader US dollar environment often proving to be a more significant driver than the energy shock itself, presenting a nuanced view for investors.