Despite models being technically multimodal, the user experience often falls short. Gemini's app, for example, requires users to manually switch between text and image modes. This clumsy UI breaks the illusion of a seamless, intelligent agent and reveals a disconnect between powerful backend capabilities and intuitive front-end design.

Related Insights

The review of Gemini highlights a critical lesson: a powerful AI model can be completely undermined by a poor user experience. Despite Gemini 3's speed and intelligence, the app's bugs, poor voice transcription, and disconnection issues create significant friction. In consumer AI, flawless product execution is just as important as the underlying technology.

Current text-based prompting for AI is a primitive, temporary phase, similar to MS-DOS. The future lies in more intuitive, constrained, and creative interfaces that allow for richer, more visual exploration of a model's latent space, moving beyond just natural language.

Despite access to state-of-the-art models, most ChatGPT users defaulted to older versions. The cognitive load of using a "model picker" and uncertainty about speed/quality trade-offs were bigger barriers than price. Automating this choice is key to driving mass adoption of advanced AI reasoning.

AI apps that require users to select a mode like 'image' or 'text' before a query are revealing their underlying technical limitations. A truly intelligent, multimodal system should infer user intent directly from the prompt within a single conversational flow, rather than relying on a clumsy UI to route the request.

Despite Google Gemini's impressive benchmarks, its mobile app is reportedly struggling with basic connectivity issues. This cedes the critical ground of user habit to ChatGPT's reliable mobile experience. In the AI race, a seamless, stable user interface can be a more powerful retention tool than raw model performance.

While chatbots are an effective entry point, they are limiting for complex creative tasks. The next wave of AI products will feature specialized user interfaces that combine fine-grained, gesture-based controls for professionals with hands-off automation for simpler tasks.

The best UI for an AI tool is a direct function of the underlying model's power. A more capable model unlocks more autonomous 'form factors.' For example, the sudden rise of CLI agents was only possible once models like Claude 3 became capable enough to reliably handle multi-step tasks.

The best agentic UX isn't a generic chat overlay. Instead, identify where users struggle with complex inputs like formulas or code. Replace these friction points with a native, natural language interface that directly integrates the AI into the core product workflow, making it feel seamless and powerful.

V0's initial interface mimicked Midjourney because early models lacked large context windows and tool-calling, making chat impractical. The product was fundamentally redesigned around a chat interface only after models matured. This demonstrates how AI product UX is directly constrained and shaped by the progress of underlying model technology.

Widespread adoption of AI for complex tasks like "vibe coding" is limited not just by model intelligence, but by the user interface. Current paradigms like IDE plugins and chat windows are insufficient. Anthropic's team believes a new interface is needed to unlock the full potential of models like Sonnet 4.5 for production-level app building.

AI's Multimodality Promise Fails at the UI Layer, Not the Model Layer | RiffOn