A significant, often unspoken, value of third-party software is accountability. When a critical system like an open-source database fails, companies need a vendor to call for support and to bear responsibility, a crucial 'cover your ass' function.
Related Insights
The notion of plug-and-play enterprise software is a fallacy. For decades, large software implementations have secretly relied on extensive services from firms like Accenture for configuration. GenAI simply makes this reality transparent, requiring customization upfront rather than dressing it up as a simple software sale.
When deciding to build or buy, the key factor is strategic importance. Never cede control of technology that is core to your unique value proposition to a vendor. Reserve outsourcing for necessary but commoditized functions that don't differentiate you in the market.
When a company adopts third-party software like Workday for HR, it's not just buying a tool; it's implicitly accepting that vendor's philosophy on how a process should be run, potentially limiting strategic flexibility.
A key business advantage of open source is its irrevocable license. This allows companies to invest in building infrastructure around a tool like OpenFold without the risk of a commercial vendor changing terms, shutting down, or being acquired, thus preventing vendor lock-in and ensuring long-term stability.
The "SaaSpocalypse" narrative misses a key reason large enterprises buy from vendors like Salesforce. It's not just about features, but accountability—like hiring McKinsey, it provides "air cover" and "a throat to choke." This institutional trust is a powerful moat against nascent, AI-generated tools.
The open vs. closed source debate is a matter of strategic control. As AI becomes as critical as electricity, enterprises and nations will use open source models to avoid dependency on a single vendor who could throttle or cut off their "intelligence supply," thereby ensuring operational and geopolitical sovereignty.
While modern UIs are essential, the backend IBM i (AS/400) platform remains entrenched in many businesses. The reason is its extreme reliability and stability, which would require massive, difficult, and expensive custom software development to achieve on open systems like Linux.
The key to Red Hat's commercial open-source business is providing value the community doesn't. While open-source communities focus on rapid innovation, enterprises require long-term (e.g., 10-year) support and stability for the software they deploy—a paid service that Red Hat provides.
With AI commoditizing code creation, the sustainable value for software companies shifts. Customers pay for reliability, support, compliance, and security patches—the 'never ending maintenance commitment'—which becomes the key differentiator when anyone can build an initial app quickly.
AI can generate code, but the real value of enterprise software is its integration into complex human workflows, the massive costs of change management, and network effects. These human-centric problems create a durable moat that code generation alone cannot overcome.